I got mine in today. It’s dark out now, so I’ll take pictures in the morning.
The good:
- Scales are nice and thin, and evenly matched.
- Great transitions from scale to booster.
- Love the slanted bolsters.
- Stamps and etches are all well done.
- It’s so nice to have a traditional with CPM-154 blades.
- Love the shapes of both blades.
- I really like the size and weight of the knife.
- The pull on the sheepsfoot is about a 4, but very crisp. I like it.
The bad:
- I got unlucky on the covers. Mine are very light, with little contrast. I may try to improve the contrast with potassium permanganate.
- The multiple gaps between the springs and liners are quite bad. Worse than even my worst Case or Queen.
- The thickness behind the edge of both blades runs from about .038” to .040”. That instantly makes the knife a safe queen in my opinion.
- The pull on the clip blade is about a 3, and not very crisp. Not terrible, but in no way impressive.
- The long pulls are very wide and rounded looking. They are perfectly functional, but not aesthetically pleasing from a traditional perspective. Very modern looking, like the Lionsteel Roundhead pulls. But they look out of place on this particular folder.
All in all, I’m not blown away. Natural covers are luck of the draw, so no biggie there. The spring gaps are more cosmetic than anything, so I’ll grudgingly forgive. We all knew that the pulls on the Buck blades were a concern, and they’re about what we expected. Weak but not dangerously so. But the thickness behind the edges is an unacceptable mistake. Overall, the aesthetics are not good enough to make it a nice safe queen, and the thickness of the grind makes it even less valuable as a user.
Sorry, but I’m just not feeling this one.