[video=youtube;_E7hjGNaIe4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E7hjGNaIe4[/video]
The Trailmaster went much deeper than the Scrapyard on that one...
For the record, the Trailmaster is
not my standard bearer chopper in 9" knives: The 8.9" Randall Model 12 is, by a moderate margin. The Neeley SA9 beat them all in chopping, but I just found out the edge crumbles badly on wood, so there is something badly wrong in the heat treat...: Still blew away everything, crumbling edge and all... The Trailmaster's cut is behind the Randall...:
Keeping edge-holding in consideration (so out goes the SA9), the Randall is definitely a better chopper than the Trailmaster, but it loses some efficiency by being just 022" thick, well under claimed stock specs like all Randalls... This makes me favour the best chopper by size (also a 0.020" edge bevel), the smallish Al Mar 7.75" "Special Warfare", whose blade is a true 0.25" thick, and chops almost on par with all the larger knives, despite a light and thin point: Incredible, and seemingly related to the oversized handle... And its AUS-6 holds its edge quite well...:
If you have one knife that has a 0.020" edge bevel, and another that has a 0.060" edge bevel, then you can't really say the thicker one will ever have an "equal" edge for chopping...
That being said, the Neeley SA9
did have a 0.060" edge bevel, a clumsy dull piece of crap edge I fully expected to be dead last in the above line-up, so much so I initially did not include it, as you can see by its absence... And then I try it and somehow, with badly crumbling edge and all, it blows everything away by some margin... Maybe the round handle cross-section was bigger in plan view, and so just plain better at transferring force... Maybe there is hope for out for out of the box Busses after all, depending on how the handle works...
Gaston