The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Have you tried to post in the WTB section here on BF?I'm going to check one out - BEST part is its the only RR I've seen that doesn't use that awful matchstrike nail nick ... this one has a swedge and a traditional nick - me likey. I just wish it was a bit smaller, similar to the Case swayback jack which I won't pay what they ask for them & never see a deal on one used on eBay - too many guys hunting them. I just hope I get lucky and I get one where the blade centers in the bed when closed - we shall see ...
I'm not seeing anybody chastise RR for making this knife. Everybody should be championing their effort in hopes of continued growth and added competition to other manufacturers. However, be prepared for prices to begin increasing as execution is enhanced. Which makes it important as hobbyists to evaluate the perceived value.@GasMan1 I just ordered one too. I know some folks don't like imports from certain countries and most of us don't like intentional knock offs Like all those cheap Sebenza clones sporting the CRK logo and so many others that's just an example. With the established patterns of of traditional knives I don't think that "cloning" is a problem if even possible. IMO the traditional rip offs we need to be aware of are buffed knives sold as NOS, parts knives, faked tang stamps pressed over originals or inferior steel blades and so on. In particular I don't believe Rough Rider tried to push the envelope with GEC by their production of this Swayback Warncliffe for a couple of reasons #1 RR is the result of a collaboration between one of the Largest US brick and mortar knife stores with a large internet presence and one of the largest wholesale knife distributor in the US The brand also has a very large following of it's own. In fact there has been a RR thread running here since 2008 with 242 pages and 4822 post the last post was on Tuesday two days ago HERE
I could be completely wrong it may have been an outright attempt to profit from the ideas and work of GEC either way I just bought one and no cloned credit cards were used in this transaction.![]()
I'll also add that Viper Cutlery (Italy) is making a version of the swayback pattern with Titanium liner, bolsters, m390 steel due to be released this fall, for a much higher retail price tag. It too should be scrutinized and compared to the GEC the same way, just like the Lionsteel roundhead, shuffler, dom, etc. to similar GEC patterns.
I'm not seeing anybody chastise RR for making this knife. Everybody should be championing their effort in hopes of continued growth and added competition to other manufacturers. However, be prepared for prices to begin increasing as execution is enhanced. Which makes it important as hobbyists to evaluate the perceived value.
I'm not seeing anybody chastise RR for making this knife. Everybody should be championing their effort in hopes of continued growth and added competition to other manufacturers. However, be prepared for prices to begin increasing as execution is enhanced. Which makes it important as hobbyists to evaluate the perceived value.
That is a bit of a reach. You have now moved the discussion from what is obviously a closely copied knife, good or bad; to all knives of the same general patterns being made because they are tried / true favorites.
Consider this a chastisement, not that they'd care. The RR is a shameful ripoff of the GEC Viper. As noted previously swayback wharncliffes are an old pattern, one GEC doesn't have a monopoly on. Rough Rider could have created their own version. That's what GEC did, they didn't simply copy the Case swayback. But creativity is difficult; it's much easier to ride the coattails of better, superior product.
FYI: That problem isn’t exclusive to RR. I had to file the kick down on my Viper because the tip was a hair or two proud of the handle. I think it’s the swayback pattern generally.A quick update, something I didn't notice earlier. The tip of the blade sticks up just enough to catch you if you run your finger along the back end.
It's so close you can barely see it, but if I rub my thumb along that curve it definitely catches on the tip.
Is that one of those things you'd file the kick down slightly to fix?
![]()
It was not my intentions to call out anyone for chastising RR because as you said I did not see any post that I thought that was what the poster was doing. If I did I must have communicated my thoughts improperly
This is a 'versus' thread by title. To be able to do a back-to-back-to-back comparison of all three when all three are available is appropriate, comparing the similarities and differences in both material and construction at the different value levels. The inevitable "i can get ten RR2038s instead of one of XXXX" any why someone would choose one or the the other. What's the most common benchmark? My assumption is the GEC.That is a bit of a reach. You have now moved the discussion from what is obviously a closely copied knife, good or bad; to all knives of the same general patterns being made because they are tried / true favorites.
This is a 'versus' thread by title. To be able to do a back-to-back-to-back comparison of all three when all three are available is appropriate, comparing the similarities and differences in both material and construction at the different value levels. The inevitable "i can get ten RR2038s instead of one of XXXX" any why someone would choose one or the the other. What's the most common benchmark? My assumption is the GEC.