No, I have not handled either of the Gator Premium knives but I do remember handling the Gator shortly after they first came out. It's a nice knife and I can see why someone would consider owning one. Just not my style. I prefer knives that are a little more neutral in their ergonomics. The handle of Emerson's CQC7 is more to my taste than the Gator's.
FWIW, I just finished looking at 11 pages of folding knives on Gerber's website. The Sharkbelly looks interesting and seems reasonably priced. I also went through six pages of Fixed blades. Most of them I ruled out for one reason or another but,
the "Big Rock" looks good but, I don't need another fixed blade. The E Z Out series is ugly but lightweight and serviceable. The EAB folder is an excellent product. I already own both. Did I mention that I find Gerbers MP 400 and 600 series multi-tools to be decent products? I own three and reach for them more often than my Leatherman Wave. Both the 400 and 600 are great products for the money.
As I looked through Gerber's website I noticed many knives with the same basic styling as the Paraframe. Considering the Paraframe's poor quality, is there any reason for me to get excited about similar looking products? I think not. I also noticed what seemed to be a preference towards tactical and clip point fixed blades. Clip points are not my favorite blade style and I am not in the service any longer so I don't need all that tactical stuff.
I did not bother looking at autos because they are not legal in my state. I will admit, I kind of liked the concept of the 06 and might have purchased one if it had been available while I was in uniform. I was not as critical with my knife purchases back then. The metal handle and other reasons listed previously would keep me from buying one now. My taste in knives has changed and
so have my needs.
It is obvious to me that Gerber offers very little that I need or desire now that I have just browsed their website. Most of their products that I would find useful I already own. Combine that with the fact that other manufacturers are closer to meeting my knife requirements, there is little reason for me to consider any of Gerber's line up. I have more knives than I can really justify at this point in my life and my goal is to scale back on knives. If I can upgrade the quality of the few that I keep around, that's even better. I can't really say purchasing a new Gerber will meet either one of these requirements. Like I stated in another thread, I could live with just a Victorinox Cadet, a RAT 1, and a fixed blade. I consider the RAT and the Vic equal or better than most of Gerber's current product line.
It's not Gerber's name on the side of the knife that bothers me. The company has been headed in a direction that meets very few (if any) of my needs and I don't see that changing any time soon. Why would I want to endorse or otherwise support a company that does that?