Giveaway- enjoy bladeforums

jJnD2IB.gif
 
3600 . Are they all going to be this easy lol :-)

Sounds like we got a challenger.
Just remember you threw the bait...
I will answer with a harder question.

This question is worth 2 raffle tickets, and can ONLY be claimed by first correct answer.

A fine watch ticks 8 times per second. (balance wheel half oscillates 8 times per second)
A watches's accuracy is often measured per day, or in the higher end or adjusted spectrum it's often measured per month.
In a local watchmaker's opinion on high end watches: 15 second fast or slow should be considered tolerable. (Some manufacturers adhere to stricter time keeping: such as a grand seiko).
Let's pretend all variables (temperature, movement, etc all remain 100% identical).

Measure the maximum error rate of ticks allowed during that month, to meet the 15 second time keeping expectancy.
 
120
If I'm wrong, do I lose a ticket?
 
420-465 seconds per month (28-31 days) or 3360-3720 ticks per month..

Was the 15 sec per day or per month? Chronometer rated watches are −4/+6 per day, +/-15 seconds per month would be phenomenal for a mechanical watch.

If I'm right, which I'm probably not, I would like to donate my raffle ticket to Mel Gibson.
 
Last edited:
I am saying 15+ per month period. And yes it is phenomenal however not impossible and certainly doable with many high end watches.
Second I asking for the rate. Not the amount of errors. (Given in a percentage is preferred)
Third forgot an important detail: a month for these purposes will be 30 days.
 
error rate of .0000462962962962962962962962963
 
Last attempted lol

0.00000578703

This is kind of a derp moment to be honest. So so so so so close yet so far by technicality. I am half tempted to count it but technically very wrong.

Edit: I will tone it down some after this question.
 
Me and my big mouth :eek: I haven't got a clue .so I will have a wild guess 0.00000566703 :D
 
Back
Top