Cyrano
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2015
- Messages
- 350
He's already stated its a last ditch tool as a cop. He has 4 other tools to use before potentially using this stick-and-go style knife.
In that last-ditch scenario, how fast you can draw the knife from its holster won't matter? How quickly you can get an effective grip on the knife won't matter? How long the blade is won't matter? How secure a grip the handle provides won't matter? How the blade is aligned with the natural geometry of your arm and hand won't matter?
I understand that the act of stabbing someone is not rocket science, and that once you've put a sharp and pointy thing into an adversary, many subtle details of that sharp pointy thing won't matter much.
However, I believe it's very possible that those subtle details might matter quite a bit in determining whether or not you actually get that sharp pointy thing into your adversary quickly enough, and accurately enough, and powerfully enough, to keep you from harm.
You're putting entirely too much thought into this.
I mean no disrespect, but I believe you're not putting enough thought into this. You are using faulty logic to support a position I believe is not only factually wrong, but potentially harmful.
The question we are discussing is whether or not there are any practical differences among knives in a combat situation. I'm maintaining there might be differences, and those differences might be significant enough to alter one's odds of staying alive. You are maintaining there are no differences.
If you're wrong, people who believe you risk putting themselves at higher risk of injury or death.
You've made a claim which could have life-or-death consequences. I believe you are obliged to defend this claim with facts and logic. So far, your logic is faulty, so you have done nothing to defend your claim.