I know a lot of people move steadily up in terms of quality and investment but has anyone ever had a knife completely ruin that progression? For instance, if you got a ZT for mid-tier Kershaw money would you ever be able to buy Kershaw again?
If you by that mean, whether buying a semi-expensive and/or good quality knife ruins me for cheaper knives, which work just fine - then no.
I have more expensive knives (like most here) but not too long ago bought a Terävä 110 Puukko (and a Skrama).
The 110 is dirt cheap (in the vicinity of $30), has a good handle, a nice scandi blade with secondary bevel and will do any chore most would ask of it under most (normal) circumstances.
Bluntly spoken, a 110 (and a Squirt) is really what most of us could get by with.
The rest of the knives are just because, they are dang nice, because we are geeks and because they are there and we (sometimes) have the disposable income to put our mitts on them.
Will the Terävä outperform my CPK FK - nope (not that you can in any way compare the two - different materials, grind, price, quality, everything but for the sake of the argument in the thread).
Will it outlast the CPK - most likely not.
Could I in theory get by with just the 110, were I not a knife buying geek - in theory, yes
Does the CPK FK make my appreciate the humble cheap Terävä an iota less - nope.
.