Hiking with a rifle?

I have to carry a gun at work. I don't wish to carry one when I am trying to relax. Those worried about bear? What are you carrying and why not go to spray?

Hmm, I'm more realaxed when I carry a gun, knife, lighter and cell phone. All things that could save my or a loved ones life.
 
^ I'd rather have it and if I needed to fire it I would gladly pay the fine for discharging it and saving my life.

You say that now. Of course, it is just emotional conjecture not based on a single fact...or experience, I am willing to bet.

Weather you think it's extra weight is up to you but if you needed it I don't think you would worry about having a "written order"

My experience has shown state parks down here to lack any real reason to carry my firearms. Yea, that's anecdotal and I am ordinarily all for carrying my guns, but I just haven't seen anything in a state park that needs a good shootin...except maybe a car stereo when I am trying to enjoy the peace and quiet.

On second thought, I can only think of one "dangerous" animal I've ever come across in a state park and that was a rattlesnake, so I just walked on the other side of the trail and left it alone. My experience has shown, especially in the woods, that situational awareness negates a lot of need for weapon carry. However, if I could, I probably would once in a while, just because I believe a right not exercised is a right wasted and, as such, in jeopardy.

Hmm, I'm more realaxed when I carry a gun, knife, lighter and cell phone. All things that could save my or a loved ones life.

I, too, am generally more relaxed with them, but I'd like to think I can rely on brains to get out of most life-threatening situations. Not always the case, but my presence of mind is where the peace really comes from for me. I think many of us here feel that way.
 
I am a Texas CHL instructor.

I don't know what everyone else should or should not do. My concern on the trail is not 4 legged creatures. It is 2 legged creatures. Having a gun gives me peace of mind. It is worth the weight.

"carrying a gun isn't supposed to be comfortable, it is supposed to be comforting"


Mis-worded. Yea, you can carry one, you just can't shoot it:



http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/spdest/parkinfo/rules_and_regulations/

Sounds like carrying around a lot of extra weight for nothing to me.
 
Oh, my brother saw 8 javelinas at the state park last week. I am not worried by them at all. But kind of cool.
 
I am a Texas CHL instructor.

I don't know what everyone else should or should not do. My concern on the trail is not 4 legged creatures. It is 2 legged creatures. Having a gun gives me peace of mind. It is worth the weight.

"carrying a gun isn't supposed to be comfortable, it is supposed to be comforting"

See....I used to carry a pistol every day for work. So...that is the first thought that comes to my mind and it is far from relaxing to me. My pistol is a tool and, thus, an extension of me, my intellect, and my awareness.* I am just as comfortable, personally, with or without it. It works for me and with that in mind, I don't care if it works for everyone else because I am not charged with their well-being. No sense in discussing it really because experience trumps just about anything. I have been in situations where I am glad I had my pistol, no I won't share, but none of them happened in the woods. That being said, if I could legally open carry in the state parks, I would probably tote along a .22 or something just to have it for the odd...whatever.

*to be honest, it doesn't matter in this thread anyway, since the discussion is titled "Hiking with a rifle?"
 
You say that now. Of course, it is just emotional conjecture not based on a single fact...or experience, I am willing to bet.

I'd guess that you'ld loose that bet. There are a lot of situations which have occurred, been documented, and lead me to the same conclusion-not conjecture, based on facts.
 
If VTguy is from Vermont, chances are he has as much carrying experience as any of us. Vermont is one of the two states in the union with unregulated carry laws. And considering the Judicial System in the state of Texas, serious consideration would be given in ANY circumstance where one carried and discharged a firearm in defense of their life.
 
You have seen the buffalo out there at least?

I didn't see any last time. I only drove by the enclosure thing, though. I didn't stay around very long.

I'd guess that you'ld loose that bet. There are a lot of situations which have occurred, been documented, and lead me to the same conclusion-not conjecture, based on facts.

Really? There have been instances of people firing off weapons in SD situations in areas where it is COMPLETELY illegal and getting off with a slap on the wrist (fine)? I haven't seen any. At least, not in a cursory internet search. I am talking about anywhere they are strictly forbidden. I don't mean to sound sarcastic, that is not my intent, but I just cannot find one instance of it at all.

As an aside: I am always amazed at the number of people from other states that are experts in a different state's law/courts/judiciary. Simply...astounding...
 
Last edited:
If VTguy is from Vermont, chances are he has as much carrying experience as any of us. Vermont is one of the two states in the union with unregulated carry laws. And considering the Judicial System in the state of Texas, serious consideration would be given in ANY circumstance where one carried and discharged a firearm in defense of their life.
Spent a lot of time in Texas and Vermont? One would assume so from your tone of expertise.--KV
 
I am ordinarily all for carrying my guns, but I just haven't seen anything in a state park that needs a good shootin...except maybe a car stereo when I am trying to enjoy the peace and quiet.

On second thought, I can only think of one "dangerous" animal I've ever come across in a state park and that was a rattlesnake, so I just walked on the other side of the trail and left it alone. My experience has shown, especially in the woods, that situational awareness negates a lot of need for weapon carry. However, if I could, I probably would once in a while, just because I believe a right not exercised is a right wasted and, as such, in jeopardy.

Just as IMAGINEFJ has said, it's not animals I worry about. All I'm saying is If you are allowed to carry in a park and for some reason you had to use it and you were completely justified in using it to save your life for whatever reason the last thing I would be worrying about is the no discharge in the park law. I'm not talking about plinking a rattlesnake in a park I'm talking about a life threatening situation. My guess is the no discharge law is there to keep people from hunting, poaching, and target shooting in the back country.


Really? There have been instances of people firing off weapons in SD situations in areas where it is COMPLETELY illegal and getting off with a slap on the wrist (fine)? I haven't seen any. At least, not in a cursory internet search. I am talking about anywhere they are strictly forbidden. I don't mean to sound sarcastic, that is not my intent, but I just cannot find one instance of it at all.

As an aside: I am always amazed at the number of people from other states that are experts in a different state's law/courts/judiciary. Simply...astounding...

So when a self defense shooting happens in a waffle house, grocery store, or gas station it's not completely illegal to discharge a firearm in either of those places? It's just like your state park, you can carry at all those places but it's illegal to discharge a firearm there. They say that about the state park so people that are carrying aren't out there plinking away at things, it's a completely different situation if it's for justified self defense. I'm not an expert at Texas law and couldn't tell you what would happen if you discharged your pistol in the park to save yourself but I'm willing to bet if it was a proved justifiable shooting there not going to lock you up and throw away the key.

Almost all self defense shootings happen in places where it's illegal to discharge a firearm, city streets, stores, alley's, etc...

If a weapon is strictly forbidden like on school grounds then it's a different story and I agree with you, you are not walking away with a slap on the wrist. But your state park is not strictly forbidden like a school or post office.


I, too, am generally more relaxed with them, but I'd like to think I can rely on brains to get out of most life-threatening situations. Not always the case, but my presence of mind is where the peace really comes from for me. I think many of us here feel that way.
Agreed 100% Dougo
 
Last edited:
I usually hike with a .22 or 20 gauge just to get some rabbits or quail for the pot.
 
"Really? There have been instances of people firing off weapons in SD situations in areas where it is COMPLETELY illegal and getting off with a slap on the wrist (fine)? I haven't seen any. At least, not in a cursory internet search. I am talking about anywhere they are strictly forbidden. I don't mean to sound sarcastic, that is not my intent, but I just cannot find one instance of it at all."

Anytime a weapon is used there are potential consequenses. Those consequences can be physical, emotional, legal, or costly. As was noted, there are places where it is illegal to discharge a gun. Yet, I've read cases where shooters were not charged in self defense cases. It seems to depend, in many situations, on who is in charge at the time. The consequenses of discharging a firearm in a Texas state park are minor, IMO, compared to injury or death. The consequences of injuring or killing someone with a firearm in a self defense situation are much more serious, but it is a decision that is made in defending ones life.
It we are going to continue this discussion we might start a new thread as it seems we have hijacked the original one. My apologies to the OP.
 
first let us clarify hiking a day hike in a state parks yes I carry a side arm concealed (i have a ccl). I cary for the same reason i wear a seat belt just in case, as that there was a kidnapping, torture and murder at a park near me (north Ga) last year it is not an unreasonable precaution.

on privet land I usually cary a 44 carbine instead of a side arm because wild bore are getting out of hand and the land owners usually ask use to put them down on site.
 
If you need to use a weapon to defend your life,or a loved one, who the hell cares if its legal.
 
If VTguy is from Vermont, chances are he has as much carrying experience as any of us. Vermont is one of the two states in the union with unregulated carry laws. And considering the Judicial System in the state of Texas, serious consideration would be given in ANY circumstance where one carried and discharged a firearm in defense of their life.


Ahemmm...There are three states with constitutional carry, not two. Alaska, Arizona, and Vermont.
 
If you need to use a weapon to defend your life,or a loved one, who the hell cares if its legal.

You sure as hell will if you end up in prison, bud. Think about it. I think I'd rather be in the ground than in a cage.
 
"I think I'd rather be in the ground than in a cage." DougO83

Doug, do you truly believe that? I'm not here to argue whether you should carry a handgun in a park or the woods, or not...that's a personal choice. But for anyone to try and "convince" someone that they should not seems a little arrogant to me. Maybe you do feel that being dead would be better than incarceration, but there are many who do not believe this way. If you're still alive, there's always hope. Not all of Texas is like Acevedo's Austin...and I, for one, am thankful for that!

Regards,
Ron
 
Doug, do you truly believe that?

Yes, I do.

But for anyone to try and "convince" someone that they should not seems a little arrogant to me.

So far, you are the only suggesting to convince someone of some other way. I said my preference. That's it.

Maybe you do feel that being dead would be better than incarceration, but there are many who do not believe this way.

And?

Not all of Texas is like Acevedo's Austin.

:confused:
 
Back
Top