It is a matter of taste as all makers do things a little differently. Even if there is an overall consensus of what should be if you intentionally do not then is that way on purpose. ZT likes super hard detents. But that doesnt make a hinderer or CRK defective because their detents arent as heavy. And despite what "a lot of makers" do those makers are not Rick Hinderer. Im sorry many but too many people take the way they like something done and hold that up as a the standard in which all others should be measured. That is fine, you like what you like and it is the popular opinion. But others can do it a different way on purpose. Even if every single maker besides rick came on the forum and stated that a detent should be strong enough to not be able to shake the blade from the handle it would only apply to them. If a maker says "yeah I know what the norm is but I make mine different" then there is no argument. There is not a case for an item being "defective" if the item works in accordance with the makers intentions.
True, how strong a detent is can be a matter of "taste" but this is the man's story "I carried it to work for the first time today and after lunch I thankfully noticed that the blade had come open in my pocket and the tip had actually pierced through my pants and was sticking out...This is only the 2nd time I've ever carried it and I wasn't particularly active or anything. I have a desk job. I can't imagine how it would have shaken out."
Clearly a defective product not a matter of "taste."