How bad is my batch ?

I actually corrected an entry a few years ago. About H1 steel. Whole article has changed since then though.
 
kwackster said:

US played ‘substantial’ role in causing Covid pandemic – ex-CDC chief​

Several US government agencies helped to fund lab work that led to the creation of the coronavirus, according to Robert Redfield

Article here: https://swentr.site/news/607966-us-covid-origin-claim/
(mirror website to Russian RT.com)
Click to expand...
No need to ask the Russians. Read Kennedy's book, "The Real Anthony Fauci". It is fully footnoted to cite the original information sources.
 
HJK said:
A correlation does not prove causation, much like rising CO2 and rising temperatures.
Is the same objection raised against this raised against that?
One could multiply such examples of selective "science".

If substantial serious side effects were reported in relation to any drug and this were merely dismissed as a correlation and someone saying the data warrant further inquiry is called irresponsible or malicious, then the person saying that is the one truly irresponsible or malign.
The purpose of Vaers is to gather broad raw preliminary data for further investigation and research precisely because correlations may signal side effects caused by drugs or related to drugs, not merely these vaccines, and as we have discussed at length in PA, almost all drugs do turn out to have side effects not anticipated or discovered by trials and models, and some of these do turn out to be serious; and even where they are "rare", when hundreds of millions of people are involved even rare effects can affect many thousands.

Obviously the Vaers data prove nothing except that further investigation and research are called for and those who pontificate about either the absolute safety or toxicity of any drug without a full investigation of such data are both either irresponsible or malign. I do not use the term malicious because there is so much vested interest and bias on both sides of the issue.

Those of us who expect impartial and objective science have learned, to our grief, that if there is such a thing it certainly is not in the mainstream, and again we discuss that at greater length in PA because the culprit is the politicization of science and all forms of media, which we cannot go into here.
Click to expand...
Yes. The very example of flawed logic, seen regularly in politics. The desired outcome is determined, then supported with specious information, presented as facts.

I can't count the times, I've used and had walk through, the definitions of C&C and how they are applied
 
Even with RT.com being the mouthpiece of the Russian government it is still useful to learn about different viewpoints, which they of course have on many things.
All news outlets are biased in one way or another, but comparing them can often be quite interesting.

Here in the Netherlands the RT.com website has been banned for some time now, because it often completely contradicts the official narrratives pushed by the MSM here, but as i like to make up my own mind VPN's and mirror websites have proven to be quite useful.

We have Kennedy's book "The real Anthony Fauci", and it has been read from cover to cover by my wife.
It has most definitely made an impact on her and a few of her direct colleagues in the hospital, with whom she shared it.
Some couldn't even finish the book.
 
Last edited:
The only bigger scam than the kung flu is the green bullshit.
Here in NJ many sheep are still wearing face diapers…….outside……alone.
Countless vacant storefronts.
Sickening scam.
 
knarfeng said:
wikipedia is open source. Anyone can make an addition to it. As such, it is unreliable.
Click to expand...
By virtue of being open source, anyone can edit it, and fact check it, as well. What you call a weakness, I call a strength. Sometimes that means people like Flat Earthers will be disappointed that Wikipedia calls their thing a conspiracy, but it doesn’t make it wrong. Not everything can be true.

The real problem is the unbeatable, ubiquitous confirmation bias. Once everyone gets to select their own experts, there’s no discussion left to be had. To that end, Wikipedia is just as reliable.

I’ll tell you what though, widespread disease slamming through developed nations on a century long cycle seems historically predictable. Also predictable is the anti-vaccination and pseudo science reactions.

Did you know, for instance, that long after the “vaccines cause autism” guy was discredited, people still believe MMR will give their child autism.
 
EngrSorenson said:
By virtue of being open source, anyone can edit it, and fact check it, as well. What you call a weakness, I call a strength. Sometimes that means people like Flat Earthers will be disappointed that Wikipedia calls their thing a conspiracy, but it doesn’t make it wrong. Not everything can be true.

The real problem is the unbeatable, ubiquitous confirmation bias. Once everyone gets to select their own experts, there’s no discussion left to be had. To that end, Wikipedia is just as reliable.

I’ll tell you what though, widespread disease slamming through developed nations on a century long cycle seems historically predictable. Also predictable is the anti-vaccination and pseudo science reactions.

Did you know, for instance, that long after the “vaccines cause autism” guy was discredited, people still believe MMR will give their child autism.
Click to expand...
Any information you have confirming as to why there are a high number of autistic children these days?
 
The text below currently circulates in a Dutch hospital Telegram group, and it apparently originated from the US:

Given that this is an international issue we recommend the following to all governments and medical establishment bodies worldwide:

THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS

A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.
The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings.
These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs.
Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link.
This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists.
Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm.
Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.

A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS

Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all Covid-19 vaccine products.
There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term.
Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions.
We call on the scientific community to come forward with findings from unpublished Covid-19 vaccine studies.
This will help mitigate publication bias, whereby unfavourable results were often rejected or withheld due to fears of reputational damage.
Crucially, government bodies and the pharmaceutical industry must also provide full transparency, granting access to previously undisclosed anonymised patient-level data from clinical trials and surveillance programs.
These cumulative actions will help determine any real world benefit of these products versus the true extent of the damage cause.

THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED

The denial of vaccine injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports.
The vaccine-injured must be recognised and every effort made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed.

THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA.

Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency.
These included: ‘first do no harm’, informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around.
The precautionary principle was inverted.
Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld.
The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of harm.
Emergencies are never a reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them.
Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations.

ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT.

The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way.
By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned.
An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.
We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health.
 
Last edited:
Chefget said:
View attachment 2732936
Click to expand...
All of these were created in the proper steps. They are proven effective.

The Covid vax was absolutely none of these things.

I firmly stand by “freedom of choice.” Get the vax if you want…but if it causes issues later, don’t come crying to me about it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top