how do i know if its annealed??????

im just using mine to anneal and heat treat for now. once i can afford to fill up the tank more often then i will start practicing my forging. the only forging im going to do anytime before then is making a pair of tongs so that i can work with shorter pieces.
 
Just a simple question for the knowledgeable people.
If you heat a piece of steel up to a black heat, well above any tempering-colors, but well below any redness in the steel.
Would that also be annealed?
I don`t know everything about this stuff, but i just thought, if you temper at too high a temperature, and ruin the hardening, you are generally left with soft steel. From what i know, soft steel is annealed.

So, my question is: Do you really need to heat steel up to a red heat, to anneal it??

Uh Oh, this looks like an opportunity for Kevin to go on one of his long winded techno-babbles;). Annealing in the traditional sense is recovery and recrystalization for the purposes of undoing any effects of cold deformation, cold metal workers such as copper smiths, thin smiths or silver smiths have a much greater appreciation for annealing than we do. If we were just dealing with a single metal, like pure iron things a still rather complicated. If you just want to stress relieve you can go to a lower temperature, traditional stress relieving operations are often sub critical, and involve heating to a range in which there is recovery of strain effects but not actually reforming of the grains themselves. This will make a stress free and softer metal but will not result in the softest condition, you could grind it and perhaps bend it but machining and other cutting operations could be a bit trying still.

The next level is heating to above non- magnetic and actually making all new grains with a whole new crystalline orientation. This tends to really wipe out any leftover effects it the metal, and takes all the deformed grains and sets them back to a more natural shape or size (to go really techy- it sets anisotropic effects back to isotropic). These are all the things that can be done with just a single pure metal like iron; add carbon and things get much more interesting…

With the addition of carbon you get steel and then you also have slew of phases/structures to work with. Heat a piece of hardened steel to above 350F and the trapped carbon will begin to get unstuck and gather in preferred locations to make very super fine tempering carbides, this is what results in the initial small drops in Rockwell hardness when you temper. If you increase the temperature to above 600F those carbides continue to grow until they become larger globs of carbide, quite visible under the microscope (they also have a tendency to go from a dark color to a lighter color under the scope), they grow by “borrowing” the carbon that provides the hardness in the steel. At temperatures higher than 900F they become large spheres in a field of carbon depleted ferrite, ferrite that is also undergoing the recovery and eventual recrystalization previously discussed. If one stops before reaching critical and recrystaliztion then the steel is one form of spheroidal annealed, and can be quite machineable. Here is an image of spheroidal carbide in a piece of my 1095:
9.jpg


If you keep heating until you reach critical and non magnetic, those carbide globs will then swiftly begin to get smaller as they are dissolved in the new grains, from here you go to another type of anneal (lamellar). Slow cooling (wood ash, vermiculite, shut off forge) will cause the carbon and iron (cementite and ferrite) to separate out into a banded structure known as pearlite, and is the most common form of annealed steel that bladesmiths work with. It is not as machineable as spheroidite but it does grind well and is workable. Here is an image of pearlite surrounded by heavy carbide that has collected in the grain boundaries of some of my 1095:
2.jpg


Simple anneals such as lamellar work fine for anything that has .8% carbon or less, but when you get more than that the extra carbon becomes very aggravating for machining. How many folks reading this have squeaked and dulled drill bits in 1095 that they could easily file and bend? Extra carbon like to pool up in clusters or sheets and those carbide sheets will far exceed the hardness of anything short of carbide or diamond bits. Think if it like cutting a tree with a chainsaw that has a rock grown into it, dead soft wood with a nasty surprise! Lamellar anneals tend to allow for more of these sheets to be problematic, and that is why spheroidal annealing is the most popular way to go with higher carbon steels and those with carbide forming elements. Hard little spheres suspended in soft iron offer very little resistance to a cutting tool. But a long band of carbide will just strip teeth.

When you run into this “squeaking” of tools you can’t just heat it to blue or dark dull red, as this will only allow more carbide to laugh at you, you will then need to go above critical dissolve those sheets, and then reheat and turn them into little spheres.

If I have just made some folks world a lot more complicated than they ever wanted it to be, then this post has done it job;).

If your steel is less than .8% C and very simple just get it hot, let it cool slow and be happy. If it has more alloying, or more carbon, a little more planning may have to be done.
 
hope this goes in to thte top post
also this should help me ge some planer blades soft (M2) glad i hav e a kiln
between you and mete hell i might jsut get a finget hold in this steel stuff hhahaha
 
Ahhhh.. Kevin!! THANK YOU!! *Bows in the steel dust before the great Kevin*

So, by annealing we actually want to refine the grain, and slow the cooling down to such a degree, that everything flows to where it wants to be.
By quenching, we lock the structure of the steel, (so to speak) and increase the hardness and brittleness. Then, by tempering it at low temperatures, we reduce the brittleness, but the structure of the steel remains the same.
Phew! :o I think i need to heat up some steel soon. Been too long since i`ve done it now, so i`m getting forgetful.
 
Ahhhh.. Kevin!! THANK YOU!! *Bows in the steel dust before the great Kevin*

So, by annealing we actually want to refine the grain, and slow the cooling down to such a degree, that everything flows to where it wants to be.
By quenching, we lock the structure of the steel, (so to speak) and increase the hardness and brittleness. Then, by tempering it at low temperatures, we reduce the brittleness, but the structure of the steel remains the same.
Phew! :o I think i need to heat up some steel soon. Been too long since i`ve done it now, so i`m getting forgetful.

Well lets avoid any bowing or scraping if we can, this business has way too many little tin gods already, the “great Kevin” is actually average at best but has accumulated a few insights because of the inordinate amount of mistakes he has made himself;).

Annealing doesn’t really have to do much of anything to the grain in order to be annealing, in fact many times lamellar anneals can enlarge grain, grain refinement is better handled by normalizing operations. Normalizing is not too different except that the cooling rate is quicker by air cooling and dead soft is not necessarily the goal but instead refinement and evenness of structures and resulting stresses.

By using your comparison to quenching we could view annealing as the opposite of quenching. Quenching traps carbon while dispersed in the iron, while annealing allows it to separate out as much as possible. Tempering is often thought of as just a lesser anneal, often being described as “heating up until the steel softens a bit”, but it is not that simple and it is not just a lesser anneal. Tempering maintains the martensite phase (hardened steel) entirely it just stabilizes it. Trapped carbon forces the iron atoms in a different arrangement than they want to be at room temperature, this creates enormous stress/ strain issues and is why untempered steel can warp or even crack on its own. Tempering allows some of the trapped carbon to move to locations that allow the atomic arrangement to “relax” a little. But more involved tempering also allows carbon to accumulate and at very tiny points and form tempering carbides which can increase hardness (as far as abrasion resistance). And if certain carbide affecting elements are present can cause a secondary hardening effect and even embrittlement in certain temperature ranges. Somewhere in my files I have some images I managed to capture of larger tempering carbides, they are normally too small to see with optics but eventually they can be made out as very fine black dots in the matrix.

But as you can see tempering and annealing are definitely two different operations.
 
Kevin is a very humble Steel God, but in front of us mere mortals that look dumbfounded at the incandescent steel, and quench it in oil hoping for good, he's a God nonetheless. :D ;)
So, I'll pose a question, a practical one.
I work with C70 (0.70 carbon, and no problem there) and W2 (Nicholson files), which I think has from 0.9 to 1 in carbon.
I anneal them by heating to non-mag in the forge and let cool as the forge cools down.
I then forge them.
Then I normalize this way: heat to non-mag, soak for a minute or so, and let cool in still air. Look for warping. If there is any warping, I straighten, and then normalize again. If there's no warping I normalize once more, again heating to non-mag and cool in still air.
I then heat to non mag, then soak a couple of minutes, and quench in mil-spec hydraulic fluid.
I then clean up, remove any trace of oil (it's corrosive and I noticed it creates fake tempering colors if left on the blade, so I use acetone to clean the blade thoroughly) and temper to color, being careful to let the blade warm up over at least 10-15 minutes and keep the blade at that temp at least another 10 minutes, so that it soaks the temper through.
Is this good, and will I get a good grain, or should I change something in the process?
I have only a coal forge an a magnet, no way of judging accurately the temperature but the eyeball, mk I sensor (and a faulty one, for what matters... strong miopy... :rolleyes: ).
 
Alarion, this looks good to me, but the part where you "soak a couple of minutes", may be costing you, unless you have a very accurate way of maintaining the temp that you want. The only reason I mention it is that its hard to keep the temp of a coal fire dead on. IT may in fact be several hundred degrees hotter than your non-magnetic temp. To hot means large grain, and you don't want that for quenching.
Kevin will hopefully correct me on this one.
 
Normal hardening is done usually about 50-100 F above the critical .A reasonable soak would be about 5 minutes.Excessive time at soak is rarely a problem but excessive temperature can rapidly cause grain growth ! Tip and edge are particularly sensitive to overheating since they are so thin. Once you get to the critical watch color very carefully .I have always preferred a good long temper ,1 hour at least , 2 hours better. A kitchen oven [clean knife thorughly first for wife !] will do the job much better than the eye .Check to see if oven is accurate.
 
I hope what I post does not leave the impression that a person working with very simple equipment cannot make a good knife, the message I am really trying to convey is that like any other field one needs to match the sophistication of their tools with the complexity of what they are working with. Simple steels like 1070, 1095 or W1 can be treated surprisingly well with very simple tools if one understands the things occurring from the operations used. Heating a steel with no additional alloying elements in a forge can easily get it in good shape for full hardness. If the carbon is closer to .8% the soak time can even be less critical. Huge blocks of time can be replaced with just a few degrees more in temperature.

I do however hope information that I share can help in understanding that more complex alloys can have much more of their potential realized with the use of more sophisticated tools. When I say more complex alloys I am not talking about the jump all the way to high speed or stainless steels. Contrary to popular concepts I personally do not consider alloys such as O1, 52100, L6 or even 5160 to be beginner level steels if one is looking to have total control over their potential. Yes, acceptable knives can be made from them without knowing exact temperatures, but for more some years now I have been focusing on the material properties and how they are effected by heat treatment and I have found numerous more possibilities of outcomes in steels that have alloying than something as simple as 1070. Simple 10XX steels, up to the eutectoid, have simple hardness considerations and if you can make mostly hard stuff with very little soft stuff mixed in you have success. When complex carbides get involved there are degrees of success and success can be determined by any number of properties and their application.

One example is impact strength, or toughness. With 1070 if you make it fully hard the amount of tempering will determine its toughness, so the whole proposition is a compromise between hardness and toughness. Add a relatively small amount of nickel to the mix and you no longer have such simple considerations and toughness is achieved from another source, this is why something like 15n20 or L6 can have a greater toughness than 1070 even at much higher hardness’. This is after all why alloys were developed, the compromises in very simple steels were no longer acceptable for many modern applications. One can also play with the carbides to get abrasion resistance with lower overall hardness and thus higher toughness. But if you are going to play games like intentionally only pulling .7% carbon into solution while leaving a remainder in carbides, you are going to need the precise tools to allow for that.

I am not a steel god or an “expert”, I am a guy who decided to devote much time and finances into knifemaking as my profession. I used to do all my own automotive work, but I now find it impractical. Although I have the mechanical aptitude and knew exactly what needed to be done, Friday I paid a garage to do the work because they have the specialized tools to get it fixed permanently in 1 hour. If it is an oil change or simple maintenance, you bet I can do it just as well, but if it is a complex automotive task I don’t have the tools those guys do. My pride survived, heat treating is a hell of a lot more complicated than fabricating and installing an exhaust system;).
 
Thanks aganin Kevin. You are very helpful, as always, and reading you is not only a pleasure, but very instructive.
You should write a metallurgy handbook. Those I've found from professors of universities are not even half as good in explaining as you are.


For heating to heat treat I avoid using a full blow in the forge. I instead build a deep, hot mass of coals, turn down the air until I have a homogeneous orange mass of coals, and heat up the blade with that. If the blade fails to reach non-mag, I turn up some more air to get the mass hotter.

For differential quenching, I use a hotter forge: I heat just the edge of the blade, while the spine remains relatively cool, and as soon as I reach non-mag, or a little later, I quench. I seem to have good results with this method, but I'll have to get a hardness tester, and make some destructive tests.

Kevin: I abuse once again of your patience with a further question: when you take steel grain pictures like those you posted in some threads, which equipment do you use?
A microscope with camera attachment?
I've tried using a high-resolution scanner to perform very high resolution scans of very small portions of a broken piece of steel to get the grain magnified, and it seems to work. I used 1200 dot per inch definition, but I'm planning to buy a 9600 DPI or higher flatbed scanner. Could this be a good idea (I'd use it for other things over scanning destructive tests of blades)?
I don't have the money for a serious microscope, and flatbed scanners are cheap...
 
If I cannot work in salts and I have something like 1084 I also prefer to use a coal forge in much the same way, being carfeul to heat the spine and tang area first, the edge next to last and the tip is the ver last thing to come up to temperature before quenching. A coal forge will allow for this kind of controlled and directed heating. In a gas forge everything heats at the smae time meaning the tip and edge are going to get hot long before other parts of greater mass.

A flatbed scanner is a good idea and they are getting cheaper and better all the time. All of my imagery, from photos of the knives to metallography is done with my Canon digital camera. Of course images such as those in this thread at 400X or better magnification are not possible with scanner or camera alone but if I remember the grain size images you are thinking of, it was done by sticking the samples on the wall with modeling clay in front of the Canon, in macro mode, on a tripod. With the scanner, as well as the camera, the real issues are the lighting. Not only does there have t be enough of it but it needs to be the right color, and the computer or camera will read those colors entirely different than your eyes. The new digital cameras have so many wonderful choices in light compensation settings that it is possible to take pictures almost anywhere. Here is another lesson in matching tools for the job. I could never get it right with 35mm film, I know a professional could look at the ambient light and know exactly what lense, filter and setting to use to get the shot the first time, but I am not a photographer and don’t have the time to learn to be one. Then along came digital cameras that could figure all that stuff out for me, I finally had a tool that could do the job:)

I used to have more clarity issues with my other scopes because of the way the camera mounted in the tubes above, and the hassle of having to carefully level the sample.
mics.jpg


But then I got my inverted metallograph and everything got much easier for me.
scope.jpg

the camera mounts rigidly below on a port dedicated to photography and the samples lay level on the stage above the objectives. Once again simple magnifying glasses and such will allow one to have very basic looks at the steel, but if you are going to be ridiculous enough to have to look inside the steel, you are going to need the tools to do that much more involved task. I always like to take this opportunity to stress that metallographs are entirely over the top and unnecessary in making knives. I still don’t know how I managed to talk my wife into allowing me to buy all this equipment that really won’t help make knives any faster (in fact, slows me down quite a bit :( ), I got lucky with that choice. I just developed an obsession with what is going on inside the steel, and started accumulating equipment. I think that may be the difference between a job and a hobby, I am very aware of every large expenditure for the knifemaking end of things and am always justifying it with how soon it will pay for itself. With my other interests I don’t even notice the bill that is accumulating and don’t really think about whether it will ever justify the expense.
 
Whoa! That some hot piece of equipment you've got there Kevin!
Well... I think it's well over my head for now. I'll just make do with the scanner, right now.
At my level it's already something looking at the coarseness or smoothness of the grain, without going to look inside pearlite crystals and boundary carbure in hyperecutectoid steels at high magnification.
I'll follow your advice and stay within my equipment, which is moreover far more advanced than my skills, right now. :rolleyes:
Medieval equipment = medieval steels. If and when I'll reach medieval skill is yet to be known... :p

I'll just cheat a little with this small hi-res flatbed scanner. Hope the umpires don't spot it and sanction me :D
 
Back
Top