- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 25,895
While I don't doubt photographers had props, are you trying to say that the soldiers didn't really carry D Guard Bowies? Or just that they didn't carry large (sword length) D Guard Bowies? You might be able to make a case for the latter, but...
The large number of original Civil War era D Guard Bowies in existence today (you can get them on eBay) would indicate to me that they were very prevalent. And as a "poor man's sword" I can imagine that the long ones were not uncommon, but...they are not as well represented in the ones still in existence.
If all the D Guard Bowies were just photographers' props, there would not be many still in existence.
First off, eBay sellers are prone towards mis-identifying things if they think it'll generate more clicks and bids. There are jokes in the antiques world about how just about anything big and knife-like is a bowie knife, any weird long edged tool is a whaling tool, any big axe is an executioner's axe, etc. in addition to a huge number of fakes being made, artificially aged, and put up for sale. What I'm saying, however, is to take portraits with a grain of salt. They often do not accurately illustrate what a given soldier wore or carried. Bowies in general were private purchase items rather than issued in most cases, and were kind of a pop-culture phenomenon of their period. If I remember correctly there was some small number of them issued in the South, but those are pretty scarce compared to private purchase examples. In general, be skeptical unless there's well-documented provenance for a given piece.