I want to add some salt to this thread, and throw in another level of facing the subject.
Ok, we all have our preferences on the number of blades. Some like one, some prefer two, or three, and so on.
The next question is: why?
Is it a matter of function? of aesthetics? of just some kind of "the more, the merrier" thing?
As for function, I can see the point. I grew up with the "one blade for all tasks" philosophy, but I know that having a choice of different blade shapes and sizes can help with different tasks. Also, I'm sensitive to the "clean blade"/"dirty blade" thing too...but then, some knives offer "double" blades, and I can't understand why. Pic as example:
Aesthetics may play their part too. Some multibladed knives have a certain
charme in the subtle balance of the blade shapes; Elliott's latest Christmas gift, made by Richard Rogers, is a clear example of what I want to say: it would be very very very hard to beat the blade richness and balanced variety of that knife, and I'm specifically talking about aesthetics (of course, it's a personal opinion).
The more, the merrier...it sounds good. It is, after all, the ancient appeal of having a choice. Doesn't matter if the choice can get kind of random at times. The simple idea of choosing between few options can be way more powerful than what we imagine.
So what do you think? I don't have an answer yet. And yes, know, it might be a weird point of view, but nightshifts can get long here...
Fausto
