If a flat rate box costs me 5 bucks or whatever, add 4$ for the gallon of gas and an hourly rate for me mailing it. Honestly I feel like people have gotten too accustom to the "amazon way" and they forget this logic is why we have seen so many brick and mortar and otherwise wonderful companies perish.
It takes you a gallon of gas and an hour to ship a package? That is very inefficient, and Case has a shipping and receiving department where they use 0 gas, and get the entire process taken care of in under 2 minutes.
Secondly, I found a Bone handled mini trapper for $37 in the first search result - I didn't even shop for best price.
Everyone keeps echoing "logic, logic", but most of the arguments being made are exaggerated. You won't walk into any auto mechanic in the country for a repair, and the result be "Well, I fixed your car, but it's going to cost $23,495. What was this, $24,000 new?". Case did NOT do that directly, but they did in a roundabout way - they made a simple repair (from experience I know the labor was minimal. I think many of you are not clear on how long it takes to pop off handles and put new ones back on when you have the best tools for the job. Just because it's a repair doesn't mean Case sends it to a secret in house Master knife maker to do the work with old school hand tools.), and charged a reasonable amount - 15$. However, they're charging 10$ shipping for an item that would be about 3$ in standard postage. The could have sent it in a small flat rate box for a minimal fee also (it costs us $5.80, but but a company like Case has several options for lowering that cost), but larger companies almost never use flat rate boxes unless it offers a cost savings, and it rarely does.
It would have been about the same if he sent in a knife with Yellow handles, so the 37$ argument only applies to this knife, and you wouldn't be using that if it was a yellow handled knife that they charged him 28$ for. Nobody is considering the value that offering a repair service adds to the business. Putting a 15 year old knife back into the market is one of the best marketing ploys a company can make, and for a company like Case that thrives on loyalty and repeat business, they would benefit from the repair service even if it was operated at a loss. Since they do warranty repair, it's not an undue cost to repair and ship out OP's knife - it definitely doesn't take an hour and a gallon of gas for them to receive it and ship it back excluding the labor. Case needs to figure out the shipping cost - otherwise they have developed an acceptable method for handling these repairs (I think 15$ + shipping would have been acceptable to OP), but have a horrible practice for shipping that makes the entire service questionable. At the very least, they should have quoted the price before doing the work. Now they have OP's knife for ransom.
Case knives are made on an assembly line, but they are still worked by hand. The same tools are used for every single step that the OP had done as what they use in production. The same jig, hammer and press to attach the handles - then to the hefters to shape the handles and blend them into the bolsters, then to polishing, then to honing, and then for a final polish, cleaning and visual inspection. 15$ was actually a little high on the labor that was completed, but they are operating a business so nobody expects them to do repairs for free - they don't expect to encounter a designed obsolescence (that is actually what this practice is referred to - when the cost of a repair is close to or more than the cost of a replacement, when the actual parts and labor should be significantly less) on a product like a Case knife. Since there is no logical reason that the shipping costs should be $10, one can only assume that they did this to discourage customers from using the repair service, or to encourage customers to buy a new knife instead of getting an old one repaired.
Actual Shipping cost for 3oz Case Mini Trapper from Bradford, PA to Cincinnati, OH
In Box: $2.32
In Large Envelope: $1.40
The 50% rule - consumer advocates have long recommended skipping repairs and buying new if the cost of repairs are more than 50% of a replacement. Since this instance obliterated a commonly held rule of thumb, Case should have notified the customer prior to completing the repairs.
If I can ship something to you for $1.40, why can't a large company that has streamlined shipping practices, an abundance of packaging materials, daily pickups, and likely a postage discount?
Of course, I think that most of the responses come more from bias than anything, so I don't expect the facts to play much of a role in altering your opinion. I don't think anyone here would defend Case quite as hard if they charged them $30 to re-handle a yellow handled Peanut though.