bigmark408
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,995
It would appear you are more of the "i make what i want and if people like it great, if not? Whatever" kind of maker. With that said if you plan on ever taking orders or really making a career out of knifemaking you might find compromising a bit will go a long way to success. I see lots of makers who resist change and refuse to try new things or evolve. Some of those makers have earned their stripes and they can sell the toothpick out of their mouth. Others however who have not established themselves yet get stuck in their ways usually disappear pretty quickly.
On a plus side i think you abilities have dramatically improved. Your grinds look more precise and the level of fit and finish has noticeably improved. Still i would be lying if i said i didnt agree with a few of tthe comments. For me when i see a chisel grind and a logo like that I too think its sorta lazy. Maybe lazy is not the right word. I think for me fear would be a better word if it were a knife I was making. I would look at how good I did on that side and freak out I couldnt mirror that image on the oher side. When i see your comment "this is a fighting knife. I prefer a chisel grind on a fighting knife because it provides a more aggravatted wound chanel". I think to myself, "Does he really feel that way or is that the clever excuse that was thought up to justify only grinding one side of the blade due to being at the limits of his abilities?"
You have to remember you are a relatively new maker and most are familiar with you and your builds. People see you mostly sticking to chisel ground blades and wonder if that is you limitation. I am all for chisel grinds, toxified handles and the rough look. Some makers really prefer the rustic worn look on knives and some guys really do prefer chisel grinds. What i am getting at is that I will always have more respect for the maker who chooses to do simplified or rustic builds if I know that is truly what they prefer to make as apposed to being at the limits of their abilities. In other words i have a lot more respect for the maker who chooses to stonewash a blade because he genuinely prefers that finish rather than the guy who does stonewash finishes because he has not learned or has no desire to do mirrored or even a hand rubbed satin blade
With that said again i think its a vast improvement over your previous efforts. But i would love to see you do a double ground blade with a hand rubbed satin finish and fully sculpted and rounded handles. Because then every knife you built afterwards I would know was a genuine form of artistic expression rather than a show of limitations. Either way its still a great looking knife and i love the wood handle. Reminds me of a maple burl that was dyed green. Maybe lacewood?
WOW....Where have you been ? Stonewash and 220 grit are the new hand satin and mirrored .... You would be surprised to know that some of the old hand satin finishes were not "hand satin"....i guess custom makers are getting lazy or lost the ability.


