- Joined
- Apr 27, 1999
- Messages
- 620
I am a moderator on this forum, which is something that I am extremely honored to be. The folks who visit and post here are GREAT PEOPLE and, with few exceptions, this forum moderates itself. My links to Gurkha House and this forum are strictly personal. I have no commercial stake in GH. My stake in all of this is far more valuable than money. I have a friend that I didn't have 14 months ago. Craig Gottlieb is one of only a handful people on earth that I would trust to cover my back in a bad situation. I've spent most of my adult life going in and out of bad situations for a living. I'm very picky about who I trust.
Now, to the heart of the matter. I'm awfully sick and tired of hearing the same old song about GH Khuks being somehow inferior to other brands. It pi$$es me off that every so often Craig has to defend himself and his products against these alleged "deficiencies". I own GH Khuks, there is nothing inferior about them and I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is.
I have a beautiful, new-in-box, GH 16" AngKola. It is nothing short of magnificint. I will put this Khuk up for testing against any other brand Khuk of similar size, weight and construction. To seperate the men from the boys, I'll throw in $100 in cash out of my own pocket. The deal with the cash is that if, after testing, the GH Khuk is determined to be an inferior product I'll give the $100 to the challenger to cover his costs and spend as he pleases. If the GH Khuk is found to be equal to, or better than, the challenger's Khuk he will donate $100 to Educate The Children. Let's call it a testing fee to be paid by the loser.
Some rules have to be established here. From my side, I only insist on a level playing field. Craig will be learning about this for the first time right here with the rest of you. This isn't sponsored or funded by Gurkha House. This is my idea and mine alone. So, I insist that any challenger's Khuk be his personal property, like mine is. It's easy to brag when you've got nothing to lose. Talk is cheap.
As for the testing I'll leave the questions of who, what, when and where up to you folks. I want to see real life test situations. No hydraulic presses, cutting torches or explosives. If the khuk breaks during testing, so be it. To go far beyond human limitations to determine an abstract failing point is only a waste of time and good steel in this instance. If you have any ideas for the testing criteria and an impartial person to perform it, list them below.
LET THE GAMES BEGIN
------------------
Blackdog
Now, to the heart of the matter. I'm awfully sick and tired of hearing the same old song about GH Khuks being somehow inferior to other brands. It pi$$es me off that every so often Craig has to defend himself and his products against these alleged "deficiencies". I own GH Khuks, there is nothing inferior about them and I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is.
I have a beautiful, new-in-box, GH 16" AngKola. It is nothing short of magnificint. I will put this Khuk up for testing against any other brand Khuk of similar size, weight and construction. To seperate the men from the boys, I'll throw in $100 in cash out of my own pocket. The deal with the cash is that if, after testing, the GH Khuk is determined to be an inferior product I'll give the $100 to the challenger to cover his costs and spend as he pleases. If the GH Khuk is found to be equal to, or better than, the challenger's Khuk he will donate $100 to Educate The Children. Let's call it a testing fee to be paid by the loser.
Some rules have to be established here. From my side, I only insist on a level playing field. Craig will be learning about this for the first time right here with the rest of you. This isn't sponsored or funded by Gurkha House. This is my idea and mine alone. So, I insist that any challenger's Khuk be his personal property, like mine is. It's easy to brag when you've got nothing to lose. Talk is cheap.
As for the testing I'll leave the questions of who, what, when and where up to you folks. I want to see real life test situations. No hydraulic presses, cutting torches or explosives. If the khuk breaks during testing, so be it. To go far beyond human limitations to determine an abstract failing point is only a waste of time and good steel in this instance. If you have any ideas for the testing criteria and an impartial person to perform it, list them below.
LET THE GAMES BEGIN
------------------
Blackdog
