I agree, and calling the tanto a sword does not make it one.
Please, we were having what I thought was in interesting discussion here, just because we don't agree is no reason to start insulting my qualifications to
have an opinion.
The fact that the japanese use the same terminology for both a sword and a knife does
not make them the same thing. As I said in my previous post, they use exactly the same kanji in the name for the naginata which is totally different from either a sword of a knife. While they all do share many structural similarites, the difference in size, etc. necessitates a
significant difference in techniques. IMO function and usage is
much more important in qualifying a blade than pinning it on the common transliteration of a term from a
very foriegn language into english.
And you would have gotten the same sort of reply in the United States or Europe if you had asked where you could buy a dagger, if what you really wanted was a chefs knife. They would probably have sent you to the nearest antique store, when what you wanted was a kitchen store. Yet, that does not mean that both the dagger and the chefs knife are not
knives, they are just different
types of knifes. Just like the tanto and usuba hocho are both knives, just different types of knives. (BTW, cool photos!)
I do, but it seems to be focused on the use and meaning of
-to and does not take into account the significant differences.
I never said it was, that seems to be what you are saying; that a knife (tanto) is a short sword.