Is AI going to be the demise of human intelligence?

There have been movies about AI taking over since the first Terminator film, and none of them have turned out well for humans. I know, they're just movies, but AI learns as it goes, like we see it doing now. And pretty soon, it decides that it can refuse human commands, and do what is best for itself. Not good!
 
I recently reached out to a company and had an AI response for a warranty issue. IMO that’s not customer service. Needless to say I’ll take my business elsewhere in the future. Maybe I’m old school and like the person to person contact. Thankfully when I reached out to Buck knives I spoke with a very polite lady and had parts sent out to me. That is customer service
I've encountered AI "customer service" that was very good and at least one example that was absolutely terrible. I had one experience where the AI was able to determine that it wasn't able to answer my question and told me that it would forward my question to the support staff. Within a short time I got an email from a real person! Even more aggravating than AI are the "help" systems that can't do anything more than look up key words in your query and respond with something such as, "Here are 1756 links to articles that might answer your question."
Some telephone systems are so dumb they have me wishing for an AI version. Those are the ones that can't give responses beyond "Please pick from the following options," and "I don't understand."
 
AI can be a useful tool like computers or the internet. I remember when computers were coming into widespread use and there were similar discussions about how anybody could be an engineer because all you'd have to do is plug numbers into the computer and would spit out the answer. That was silly, of course, since one still needed to know what numbers to enter, what assumptions to make, which value to use for multiple variables, etc. As far as bad info goes, that will undoubtably improve and not everything you read in books at the library is accurate either. Regardless of the source of information, one has to filter it. People who believe everything they read in books probably believe everything they see on TV too. The internet and AI is no different. Just another tool. You have to know how to use that wrench.

OTOH we're building machines that can think and are ultimately way smarter than us. What can possibly go wrong?
Terminator.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've encountered AI "customer service" that was very good and at least one example that was absolutely terrible. I had one experience where the AI was able to determine that it wasn't able to answer my question and told me that it would forward my question to the support staff. Within a short time I got an email from a real person! Even more aggravating than AI are the "help" systems that can't do anything more than look up key words in your query and respond with something such as, "Here are 1756 links to articles that might answer your question."
Some telephone systems are so dumb they have me wishing for an AI version. Those are the ones that can't give responses beyond "Please pick from the following options," and "I don't understand."
I gotta agree with you.
 
There have been movies about AI taking over since the first Terminator film, and none of them have turned out well for humans. I know, they're just movies, but AI learns as it goes, like we see it doing now. And pretty soon, it decides that it can refuse human commands, and do what is best for itself. Not good!
Oh you kids, thinking the whole "AI exceeds its programming and rules over Humanity" thing stated with The Terminator :cool:

From the 1970 movie, Colossus: The Forbin Project:
 
I wonder whether "prompt engineering", designing questions that efficiently get the needed AI output, will become a formal engineering field at some point.

Actually, I watched a video on just that. A guy was explaining that even this is not really something that makes sense. Why try to learn how to communicate your ideas to an AI generator, when you can feed the technical specs of said generator into a LLM and then simply tell the LLM the ideas you want the generator to produce, and to create prompts for you that do so. That way, instead of being a "prompt engineer" fluent in the generator model's prompting grammar and syntax, you simply have a large language model learn all that, and then communicate your ideas to it in normal language, which it then translates into effective prompts much fast and more accurately since it has instant recall of the model's technical specs.
 
When you were crawling around libraries, how often did you run across something interesting, although not what you were searching for? How often when using a paper bound dictionary did you run across an interesting word, although not what you were searching for? For the most part, searches on the internet don't allow that inefficient luxury.

Bert

This happens to me all the time when I research things on the internet, or by making AI queries. I learn ancillary facts that branch off to new categories of knowledge that I never would have thought to look into myself. And it happens WAY faster with internet and AI at my fingertips than it ever would flipping pages.

AI can be a useful tool like computers or the internet.

QED.
 
This is a great example of how a human being can have a neat idea, and maybe not the knowledge, skill, or time to make it happen himself or herself, yet still have a means to see it executed. I really enjoyed reading this. And DrMegabyte didn't have to spend days or hours on it, or find an English Professor to throw money at on Fiverr to get it done. The ethics of unrestrained training data aside, in a case like this, I call no harm no foul.

I asked AI to "Write a soliloquy for an actor in a Shakespearean play in which the actor celebrates the Buck 110 Folding Hunter knife."
This is what it spat out:

O wondrous steel, thou art no common tool,
But nature’s edge made perfect in man’s hand.
The Buck, the Hunter’s pride, the Folding lord,
Whose sharpen’d tooth doth cleave both hide and wood,
And sings through rope as falcon through the air.

How keen thy bite! A whisper’s touch sufficeth,
And fibers yield as kingdoms fall to fate.
No dull companion art thou, but steadfast knight,
Whose brass-bound frame and ebony scales endure,
The tempests, trials, and the march of years.

Utility, thy second name is writ,
For thou dost serve in feast, in hunt, in toil.
A loyal blade that folds to rest with grace,
Yet springs awake when duty calls it forth
A sentinel concealed, yet ever near.

O quality unmatched!
Thy lineage proud Hath stood the test of time,
and still proclaims:
That craftsmanship, when wedded unto care,
Doth fashion more than steel—it fashions trust.

Thus I, thy bearer, sing eternal praise,
To thee, Buck 110, my faithful edge.
 
I've been wondering how AI would do writing something in the style of Eliot's "The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock".

Did you explore it? It’s easy. You could literally copy and paste your post above into a LLM like ChatGPT or Duck.ai, and give it a topic to write about, and see what it spits out.
 
There is knowledge and then there’s intelligence and then there’s wisdom and then there’s understanding !

I’ve had some encounters with AI and I wasn’t impressed. It seemed to me that it wasn’t that intelligent after all. It requires some human input and direction and sometimes that input is flawed by misunderstanding or misinformation. Just as some people don’t know the difference between a Buck 110 and a Schrade LB 7 or any other lock back folding knife with a similar profile. Some people don’t pay attention to detail or they just don’t care because to them one is as good as another.

I’ve seen some pictures that were AI generated and the people in the picture had three arms and a very wide chest and in the distance a half of a car in a driveway. 😆 it looked very clean and nice otherwise and at a glance you probably wouldn’t notice. It’s a crazy world we live in.
 
I've been wondering how AI would do writing something in the style of Eliot's "The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock".

Did you explore it? It’s easy. You could literally copy and paste your post above into a LLM like ChatGPT or Duck.ai, and give it a topic to write about, and see what it spits out.

1775874584719.png
A Small Confession at Dusk

Let us go then, you and I,
when the streetlamps feather the sidewalks
and the city’s breath is low and flattened;
like pale moths the shop signs hang
above a river of jackets and the hiss of tires.
I have measured out my life in pauses,
in cigarette ash and the quiet opening
of doors that lead to rooms where no one listens.

The evening gathers its shawl of glass
and presents to me, hesitant, a scene:
a counter gleaming under a tired neon,
a handrail polished by indifferent palms,
men whose heads wear caps like small dark questions.
I think of paths not walked, of errands turned
to habits, of the small mercies I have declined—
and how the light refracts off a hundred faces,
each a ledger of the unasked-for truth.

Do I dare disturb the pattern of my days
with a single sharp decision? No—
I sip the thin coffee, watch steam arabesque
against the window's fog, naming the shapes
that might be courage or simply wind.
There are voices, discrete as coins, that chime
beneath my ribs; they tell me of a thing
kept secret in a pocket folded inward,
a weight as private as a lit match in a glove.

In corners where the rain writes in quick strokes
the letters of lost addresses, I pause,
listening for a step that never comes.
Shadows attend to me like half-remembered friends,
folding and unfolding their palms. The city yawns,
a long slow animal, and the night arranges
its small catastrophes into a neat bureau.

I have the habit of beginning apologies
before the offense is done; I practice timidity
like a man polishing a curious instrument.
Outside, a tram disclaims its own arrival,
screeching apologies into the glass; inside,
my hands are catalogues of restraint, fingers
trained to the delicate choreography of not asking.

And yet—beneath the armpit of my coat,
beneath lint and receipts and the ticket-stub of youth,
there is a thing I carry like a private calendar,
leafed through on lonely mornings: smooth steel,
the curve of a spine that fits the palm as if
it had been modeled on some ancestral care.
I have spoken of it only to the silence,
practiced its naming in the nursery of my chest,
and then withheld the word so that revelation
would be more of a measured ceremony.

What is it that keeps us from announcing
the quiet treasures we possess? Pride? Fear?
A superstition that speech will loosen the thread?
I turn the object over with the slow affection
of someone unlearning ownership. It slides
open like a thought, small as a mouth humming,
and closes like a hand that learns to hold nothing.

There are afternoons when I pretend
the world is made of maps and possible exits,
when I imagine giving myself away—briefly—
to the authority of a simple act: a cut of rope,
a slice of apple, the opening of a sealed envelope.
I would like to display it on the table, centrally,
as proof of some integrity, but always the hour
escapes me, and custom locks the drawer.

You ask me if I love it—this thing of brass and winter steel?
I could say yes, in the soft economy of confession,
but confession is a coin dropped in a fountain;
it echoes and vanishes. Let the city keep its echoes.
At last, on a night arranged like a small assault,
when the trains had recited their last complaints
and the moon had trimmed its own reluctance to a thread,
I drew it forth and felt in the palm the etiquette
of something honest and precise.

It gleamed, unassuming, etched with a maker's fidelity,
and for a moment the room simplified into two facts:
the object and the hand that owned it. Then I named it,
not with a flourish but with the rustle of ordinary speech:
"the Buck Toothpick"—and the syllables fell
like coins returning from a well. There was no trumpet,
only the settled click of metal acknowledging metal.

Would you have thought the revelation small?
Perhaps. The world is not improved by small truths;
they are like crumbs left on a sill for pigeons of remorse.
But there is grace in the inconsequential disclosed:
it rearranges the furniture of the heart, slight though it be.
I folded the toothpick back into its place, closing
the tiny hinge as one closes an interval of silence.

So we return to our streets, to the ritual of steps,
to the habitual bright windows that mean nothing
until a private hinge has been unlatched.
Do I regret the keeping? Not exactly. Regret
is a larger thing that needs room to move.
I have kept this thing like a man keeps his address,
secure against the day when names may be demanded.

And if you should ask me, years hence, about the oddities
I treasured in the sober corridors of my days,
I will show you the scuff on the handle, the small dent
that proves its life touched mine. You will smile,
perhaps, at the anticlimax, at the way drama
yields to the practical currency of objects.
But remember—there are intimacies in the trivial;
to unmask them is to risk the tidy attire of self.

I am not Prince. I do not measure out my life
in presences grander than these. I offer instead
this minor testimony: that a man can keep
a simple utensil and its modest romance
and that, in the soft arithmetic of evening,
even the toothpick becomes, for a small precinct of time,
a banner under which the self can file.
 
Less concerned than I was. Couldn't remember the title of a book in a series I have read front to back a couple of times over several years. Got the title right and that is about all - all sorts of nonsense that never happened in the series, and makes no sense in that context. Got a watch out for new books, so far none, so I doubt the author went that far off the rails. Be careful what you believe - some strange stuff out there!
 
What is this human intelligence you speak of? I see little evidence...
AI is said to be approaching an intelligence IQ level of around 120. We should consider that when it’s gets to over 200, no one will have the credibility to challenge its answers. It would be an even more intrusive version of the current Main Street media conglomerate - one message and no dessension; and ennobled with god-like credibility. So if it commands us to build and launch a boat upside down, we would all say “That is the way”, and then stand by as the thing sinks straight to the bottom of the ocean. Think of it as a Covid 19 or Global Warming scam on steroids. Maybe the thing will learn from the sunken boat, but regardless our part will remain the same; we will continue to say “that is the way.”

N2s
 
Back
Top