If it's not exploiting the consumer's fear or insecurity, how else do you explain it? ?
How about because some people like the solidity of the knives?
I don't use most of my "tactical" knives for anything too "hard-core" (to use terms that others seem to employ); I use them for medium duty uses, which guarantees that they'll last pretty much as long as I care to live.
Plus, I like one-hand opening(useful when doing certain types of work, where having the other hand free to hold the thing needing cutting is key); I like thick blades(as long as they'll still cut); I like the texture of G-10, as well as the way it feels even when cold; titanium is just plain cool, whether due to its uses in the aerospace industry, its relative rarity, or the way it looks better than steel when scratched; I like the screw-together constrution as it makes disassembly easier for cleaning, or tweaking the action(be it lock-bar engagement, making the scale fit the liners better, chamfering edges, or just smoothing out the action).
There are MANY legiimate reasons for a consumer to prefer any style of knife. I don't call slip-joint enthusiasts
wimps, so I'll kindly ask that others keep their mouth shut rather than spout the tired line of
mall-ninja, or soldier wanna be, or innuendos about the size of certain body parts.
If it were about compensating for perceived short-comings, then I'd be carrying the Mercenary Sword around, as it's 4 feet of steel compared to 4 inches.
