I think innovation in knife making tech is always a good thing. However, I don't see the virtue of the SmartJig.
99.8% of the jigs out there operate on the same basic principle (outlined here
https://youtu.be/jj4ffxIPTT8). If you want to work with jigs, why not start with something that is ubiquitous and proven?
The Smart Jig and the BubbleJig are functionally the same thing - they lock onto the knife, and indicate the angle between the device and true level (we'll call this "angle A"). This is a problem, because this is not the angle you are concerned with - you are concerned with the angle between the platen and the steel (we'll call this "angle B"). As JT mentioned, when you grind the nose/belly/tip of the knife, these types of jigs don't really help because angle A and angle B are different when you're at a curved section of the blade.
If you don't agree with or understand what I mean, try drawing everything in a 3D modeling program. Or imagine that you are grinding the bevel on something extreme like a chakram. You would start with the BubbleJig or SmartJig at the 12:00 position. As you rotate the chakram, the jig sweeps from 12:00 to 3:00, and its reading becomes less and less meaningful. Eventually the BubbleJig or SmartJig will be at the 3:00 position, and here, its reading is completely meaningless.
The "normal" grinding jigs have a similar problem - as you grind the knife tip, you lose the benefit of the set angle and must 'cheat' the grind. This is hard to explain in words, but again, if you imagine grinding something extreme I think you'll get it.