Is there an unreasonable markup on Damscus vs. plain.

From a Bladesmith's perspective.... MUCH more time, effort, and knowledge is required to produce top quality damascus steel. Anyone can take a piece of straight carbon steel, heat it up, whack it a few time with a hammer and call it "forged". But it takes someone with knowledge and experience to make the forging count in the performance of the end product.
When it comes to creating damascus, in order to accomplish it successfully, the individual needs to have a knowledge of each alloy used in the billet, not only a knowledge of how the individual alloys react, but also how the vairous alloys react when joined. I don't think there is a Bladesmith out there who would argue that finishing damascus is difficult... I find the finishing the easiest part of the process, although it is more time consuming that straight steels.
Should there be a huge price difference? It depends on the damascus. For what I consider "common" patterns such as random, twist, and raindrop, beyond the time and effort at the forge, there isn't a lot of extra work involved. There are additional steps and processes that require extra time and equipment, and higher material costs than if producing a straight steel blade, so some price difference should be expected.
When you delve into the composite and mosaic arena, that changes dramatically. Both of these processes require huge amounts of material compared to a straight steel blade or "common damascus", and when it comes to mosaic, the Bladesmith can generally expect a 50+% lose of material during pattern development. When creating Mosaic Damascus, the Bladesmith is forcing materials to weld together in a manner that is neither easy or natural for the materials. This in itself requires that the individual Bladesmith be well versed and skilled to complete the process successfully. It's all about the amount of materials, time, effort, and skill. I doubt that any respectable Bladesmith is trying to "fleece" anyone with the prices they ask for their damascus knives, your simply paying for the things I've mentioned previously.
Again, there are more steps (and therefore more chances of failure) when a Bladesmith goes this route. ("Mosaic") Is it worth the extra money that we charge? That is up to the customer. I know what I have in a knife as far as materials, time, effort, and skill go, and price my work accordingly.
There are SO many factors that go into how individual Bladesmiths price their work that it's impossible to compare from Maker to Maker, however, the bottom line is what the market will bear.
There is also another factor, that I feel is very importanat, to consider; That being Sole Authorship. This is often overlooked, but I personally believe that an individual who can produce their own damascus, and turn it into a beautiful, useful product should be charging more than one who purchases the damascus from an outside source. An indiviudal who can do that, has spent the time and effort to acquire the skills and tools necessary to do everything themselves, and I consider them a more well rounded Maker. That's not to take anything away from anyone, it's just how I view things.
It all very likely boils down to supply and demand. Just like any other arena that draws "Collectors". It's the value beyond the item itself that drives the price. The knowledge of what it took on the craftman's behalf to create it, and the knowledge, skill, and quality that the item envelopes.

Hope that made some sense. I've sat here for the past 1/2 hour re-reading what I've written, and cannot find an easier way to express it.
 
I like damascus for the same reason I love hamons....it throws an unknown into the equation that is purely aesthetic but can also enhance certain properties of the knife. The idea that someone can take two different steels, blend them artistically and end up with a blade that performs as well as its parts is interesting!

For me, finishing a blade with a hamon takes quite a bit longer than damascus, but I am not forging my damascus so I cant add that for comparison. Nothing takes me quite as long as getting that finish just right on a clay hardened blade.
 
Damascus costs more because buyers like it and want it therefore makers supply it. Damascus also is very attrictive to forgers and they do it not only because the customers want it but because they derive great personal satisfaction from it. However, at the end of the day, everyone needs shoes for their little ones, so if damscus wasn't desirable to buyers, you wouldn't see much of it even from forgers. Damscus doesn't help sell many production knife designs thus you see a lot less of it in that market.

However, not everyone likes damascus. I think Kohai99 is much to harsh on 2knife. Not liking damsacus is similar to to not liking giraffe bone, which I believe Kohai99 hates. It's just personal preference not an absence of the ability to detect beauty. For example, one can like sculpture, but that doesn't mean someone who likes Picasso must appeciate Calder in order to be intellectually able to detect beauty. There is no universal "spirit of art" that "true connisuers" will detect. That's a snobbish attitude. The ability to discern "art" is a learned activity that will change in people as they age and their tastes mature. For example, the posters everyone had as a teenager are usually not even related to the art in a mature person's home.
 
brownshoe said:
However, not everyone likes damascus. I think Kohai99 is much to harsh on 2knife. Not liking damsacus is similar to to not liking giraffe bone, which I believe Kohai99 hates. It's just personal preference not an absence of the ability to detect beauty. For example, one can like sculpture, but that doesn't mean someone who likes Picasso must appeciate Calder in order to be intellectually able to detect beauty. There is no universal "spirit of art" that "true connisuers"will detect. That's a snobbish attitude. The ability to discern "art" is a learned activity that will change in people as they age and their tastes mature. For example, the posters everyone had as a teenager are usually not even related to the art in a mature person's home.

Not everyone likes damascus, that is a given.

There is a certain level of knife knowledge required to REALLY appreciate damascus for what goes into it, and what it is. If that is snobbish, so be it. You have called me snobbish and arrogant in the past, OK, fine, so be it. Get over it. David is a big boy, and a teacher, if I recall, so he should have a really thick skin, and not need you to stand up for him.

In addition, I don't mess with your spelling, generally, brownshoe, "Kohai" is Japanese for student, and 1999 is when I started studying Iaijutsu, or, quick-draw swordsmanship.

The above being said, there are certain collectors or "connisuers" that never develop an appreciation for damascus because they simply don't care for it. David has a long stated appreciation and focus for Ed Fowler knives, and multi-hardened/tempered 52100 that precludes an appreciation for damascus, because that is not what Ed is about. So to try and "convince" David what it is about damascus that is appealing is not beneficial to anyone, would you not agree?

FWIW, the rock posters of Robert Williams, Frank Kozik, Coop and Justin Hampton, as well as Mouse/Kelly, Giger, and Greg Irons, are what I liked as a teen-ager, and what I own now, and at 40, might just be called mature(at least chronologically).:D



Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
I must say Student1999 that if you still have the "wallpaper" up you did when you were a teenager, then you are unique among many adults. I gather there has been no change in your tastes since you were younger. In my hidden recesses, I still have a Montreux festival poster from 1977, but the other ones either self destructed or are no longer pertinent to what I like to look at. Personally I hated art as a child, now it is one of my pleasures. I used to love TACTICAL, but not really anymore. If your tastes in art don't mature, does that mean they are immature or did they start out fully formed?

Because you are a Student, you should appreciate my attempts to school you. When your comments are offensive, someone should say something, that's part of our responsibility to society. I certainly appreciate your efforts with me. :) By the by, just because 2knife is thick skinned and capable of his own response doesn't mean he shouldn't be supported. I certainly don't share his love of Fowler's work, but I can fully understand why he may be underwhelmed by a lot of damascus. I don't think his love of Fowler (who I despise on many levels) and his dislike of damascus preclude his ability to recognize art or greatness in a knife.
 
brownshoe said:
I must say Student1999 that if you still have the "wallpaper" up you did when you were a teenager, then you are unique among many adults. I gather there has been no change in your tastes since you were younger. If your tastes in art don't mature, does that mean they are immature or did they start out fully formed?

1. I have signed originals now, instead of centerfolds from magazines
2. My tastes have become more refined.
3. I had pretty good taste to start with, and great advisors. I have been very fortunate in listening to those that would school me. I believe it was Jeff Cooper that said ".....only interested people are interesting".

brownshoe said:
Because you are a Student, you should appreciate my attempts to school you. When your comments are offensive, someone should say something, that's part of our responsibility to society. I certainly appreciate your efforts with me. :) By the by, just because 2knife is thick skinned and capable of his own response doesn't mean he shouldn't be supported. I certainly don't share his love of Fowler's work, but I can fully understand why he may be underwhelmed by a lot of damascus. I don't think his love of Fowler (who I despise on many levels) and his dislike of damascus preclude his ability to recognize art or greatness in a knife.

1. I am not entirely sure that you are in a position to school me. I know nothing of your accomplishments, and am not going to go the Ghandi route, and say that we learn from each grain of sand, each ant, each cloud......Now, if you are an internationally ranked member of the MJER school of Iaijutsu, that would be a different story.
2. I don't need anyone to defend me, and most don't unless they see someone trying to do like you have(Ie, jump all over my case for asking a specific question, with some exclusionary criteria). Therefore, I don't see the purpose in you "supporting" David. He is fluent in his thoughts, and can verbalize issues he has, as they come up.
3. I never stated that David is incapeable of recognizing art. I said that he had a pre-disposition to be unlikely to understand the appeal of damascus. There is a difference. Years ago, Rick Fields was doing some of the best nudes in scrimshaw likely to ever be done, but people objected vociferously to the subject matter, so he stopped doing them. Doesn't make them any less artistic.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Don- relating to the two blades presented. My personal choice, without difficulty, would be the damascus. Partly due to the pattern but more the blade shape. I also find the hamon line on the forged carbon blade to be more than I like in a hamon line. Now, if both had the same blade shape, I'd lean toward the damascus still. Change the hamon line and ??? could now be tough.
 
Hi I'm Devin's son, and I have to tell you guys, if anything, we might have to raise prices. We can't keep up with anything, not even close, and the price of steel continues to go up. Our prices haven't ever been raised, that means they're the same they were back in the 80's. Go and thank your lucky stars that Devin Thomas damascus is so affordable. We're in a weird spot right now, in between being a one man show and transforming in to a larger company. The problem is that with the extremely high quality of the forging, you can't just hire anybody. In fact, I would say that maybe as high as 80-95% of all people who forge damascus are not at a level high enough to forge for Devin Thomas damascus.
 
If Devin hasn't raised his prices in 20 years he is either a really bad businessman or was overcharging 20 years ago.

I am thanking my lucky stars! I guess!


:)
 
From my perspective, it's more difficult to get a super clean, pristine finish on a plain mono-steel blade than it is to finish a damascus blade. The 600X finish I put on Double Trouble (S30V) was a royal PITA. A "perfect" 1200-1500 grit finish is one of the hardest finishes to pull off (IMO), as any flaw will show like mad.

That is purely from the FINISHING side of this equation.

Most of my damascus blades are taken to a 600x hand-sanded finish, then etched. After etching, it's a matter of whatever grit sequence makes it look best. Usually some cold blue to help highlight the contrast and some VERY wet sanding with 2000x paper.

To bring out a hamon, I take a blade to AT LEAST a VERY VERY clean and even (uniform!) 1200 grit finish, but often finer. Then etch with vinegar many times and follow up with polishing powders and/or pastes to get the desired effect. I just did this to a 4 year old knife that had gotten rust pits in it, and I had two FULL days of work (and a handful of hours here and there prior- doing rough clean-up) to get it done.

But since the original question was about damascus... I think the amount of mark-up should be (and most often is) directly proportionate to the type of steels, pattern, and finish the maker had to use.

As Ed pointed out, a very complex mosaic steel can have you slaving at the forge/grinder/powerhammer/press for days... even weeks (huh hum Tom Ferry ;) ).

Don... I like the clay-hardened blade, but that damascus blade really works for me as well. Let's call it a tie :D :cool:
 
In damascus, like other steels, you get what you pay for. There is plenty of mediocre damascus out there. The really exotic patterns, made from fancier steels, by well known makers aren't cheap. But, they are the best!!
It's not unusual to spend $100 on a piece of damascus for a large folder.
And, compared to steels like the CPM alloys, that can be purchased in large sheets and WJ cut, you have to profile damascus by hand. Add to that the fact that, you have to be extra careful not to scrap that blade!! So, there is more stress on the maker.
For folders, you have additional effort masking off the area where the washers/ball ride (unless you etch that area and live with the rough action-which I have seen on many knives). Plus, adding the maker's logo generally takes more thought/planning and perhaps additional steps.
 
Sorry for making a fork in the road...

Brownshoe,
Thanks for speaking up in my behalf and the support of the free exchange of ideas here.. I appreciate hearing what you've said. There's no room for snobbery, from my good pal Ko.


Steven,
You are right that peoples taste doesn't change drastically, it's a losing fight for me, trying to appreciate or see the same thing (value) in damascus that you do. That's all. (Besides, I think I'm allergic to damascus..) :D

The true art of it and joy of it, like Ed Caffrey said very well, must be in the making. If it represents your vision of what knives should be, it's the important thing. And, the value of sole authorship.. an important ingredient of all of it. Be true to what you are, and what you do...or don't do.

(The Scagel repros I've seen in damascus look out of place.)
David
 
Gentlemen .im not a very well known knifemaker but im very big on the sole authorship thingy . my main reason for charging more money for Damascus is simple it uses alot more steel to make than "Ordinary steel ". to begin i start with 1inch wide by 8 or 10 inch thich pieces about 15 pieces tall that is like 15 feet of steel going into one "Billet ". after it all is said and done ive cleaned the steel , forged the bar ,made the pattern i was after ect im left with like 28-36 inches of steel .so about 3 knives worth if all went perfectly!my best time forging a fresh bar of Damascus was from start to finish about a day for a Simple twist pattern . 2 hours of steel cleaning with a grinder, about 5 hours of forging it using about 7-10 gallon of propane at how much per gallon ?i figure after the expenses of buying all the steel ,cleaning , welding ect im making like $3-$5 per hour ! hell ya can make more than that bending taco shell's at Taco Hell .
im not mad at anyone here i read the whole thread and simply did not see anyone post this simple fact . Why does Damascus Cost so much ? Simple Beacuse it uses alot more material/time /skill /special equipment to make :)
 
Pinoy Knife said:
i read the whole thread and simply did not see anyone post this simple fact . Why does Damascus Cost so much ? Simple Beacuse it uses alot more material/time /skill /special equipment to make :)
SharpByCoop said:
With the cost of the equipment, and labor, and the learning curve to make GOOD damascus, especially if forged by the maker, I am more surprised that there isn't a larger disparity in pricing.
It was said. Same thing, only different words.

Coop
 
2knife said:
Sorry for making a fork in the road...

There's no room for snobbery, from my good pal Ko.......You are right that peoples taste doesn't change drastically, it's a losing fight for me, trying to appreciate or see the same thing (value) in damascus that you do. That's all. (Besides, I think I'm allergic to damascus..) :D

Thanks for proving my point so eloquently, 1knut!:D

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
sunfishman said:
I spend much more time heat treating and finishing a carbon bowie blade with hamon than I do a pattern welded blade almost to the point of canceling out the time it takes to make the damascus billet or so it seems to me. So I charge about the same but a little more for a pattern welded bowie due to the amount of material used. Two blades below, which do ya'll like best?

I am a sucker for a hamon so I will say the carbon steel one, but your not lettin me see the handles lol.
 
Generally speaking, Damascus steel is way overpriced in the knife market. When you illustrate examples of very fine damascus blade makers you don't disprove that assumption; you merely indicate rare exceptions that serve to reinforce the general rule.

Another blade steel that is overpriced is S30V. The fault doesn't lie with the makers, though. The producer is charging knife makers too much for it.

The cure for high prices is high prices. There is an acceptable substitute for almost everything in a free market. The Invisible Hand find will eventually find it and put it to work. Distorted markets just make it start searching sooner.

The good thing about the best knife makers is that they don't plow their profits into boat payments, gold chains and wristwatches. The best invest in developing new designs and processes that allow them to make even better knives at the same price points.
 
QUOTE: "As far as the satin finish, very few damascus pieces (none actually) ever recieve the level of surface finish that a fogg temperline bowie does for example or even a Russ Andrews 1500 grit hunter.

Mosaic doesn't move me either. Too manipulated for my tastes."


As usual, Anthony Lombardo is right on the money. Like the gravy at a church picnic, all those layers, welding and etching can conceal a multitude of sins.
 
This thread started out asking about the comparison of purchased damascus and 'regular' blade steel as to their cost on a finished product. It has expanded to forged damascus, mosaic damascus, and carbon blades with hamons. I am intrigued by the latter processes, and happy to hear everyones opinions. The jury is still out on mine. I do know that I have seen very few finished blades with hamons that I did not like the looks of, but that can't be said for damascus. I doubt if anybody, even those who are not damascus fans, would say very much derogatory about the Fisk Tuxedo Fighter in the 'Natural handle materials' thread. But, I see several damascus blade patterns that just don't seem to go with the rest of the knife. Usually, they are too busy.
I think Bastid hit the nail on the head when he mentioned the flow that is needed with the total package when damascus is used. This can be complicated on both folders and fixed blades. Those makers that have the talent to achieve that help damascus blades stay popular. But, the clay heat treatment used to achieve hamon blades seems to be up and coming. The results are like sunsets...no two are alike. I would like to hear more from the makers on their feelings on comparing these two arenas, since we have strayed from 'purchased' and 'plain'. :jerkit:
 
Good discussion, guys.

I am showing up a day late and a dollar short, so I'll keep it to a few brief points.

1) I like all three approaches to a forged fixed blade that have been discussed - "plain" hand-rubbed finish, active hamon and damascus. At any point, all three will be represented in my collection.

2) I absolutley agree with what Ed has said. Part of my attraction to damascus is that, when well done, it represents the end product of a fairly unique set of skill and artisitc vision. Anyone who has held a Caffrey mosaic blade in hand and doesn't "get it", probably never will.

3) I don't think it can remotely be said by way of generalization that damascus represents an unreasonable markup over carbon. It may in some specific instances, the assessment of value is vastly more complex than a simple consideration of the materials used. A smart and informed buyer considers carefully the value of each piece he or she purchases. Exceptional value can be found at any price point with any combination of materials. Poor values as well.

4) I think that far too often the sheer beauty of a superbly-executed "plain" hand-rubbed satin finish is overlooked. Not everyone can do what Russ Andrews does with a 10" blade of W2. If they could, you'd see it everywhere. You don't. A maker with the skill (and patience) to really NAIL that type of finish impressed the heck out of me.

Roger

PS - here's about a 2 inch segement of an 8" Caffrey mosaic damascus blade. The knife made a great meditative tool:

orig.jpg
 
Back
Top