Using your argument regarding wise spending, three "budget knives", as you put it, "should fill every need, so why the extras"?Some of the people who shake their heads and offer not-so silent reproach to the 'elitists' who prefer more expensive knives, also have huge collections of their own. Some of those cheap knife hoarders have spent considerably more on a large number of blades than members belonging to the Secret Society of Seven-Hundred Dollar Steel.
What is it that those 2-or-300 budget knives can do (besides rust, fall apart and generally disappoint) that one good Sebenza, Rockstead, Shirogorov, Midtech, or custom can't?
I think it makes more sense to spend 2500$ (for example) on 5 very nice knives than it does to pay 2500$ for 50 knives in the 50$ range that just get piled up in a pointy heap of zytel and Chinese steel. I know some of the people acting self-righteous about the buying habits of others have made purchases I find pretty baffling myself. I don't, however, have any inclination to question or debate them about it. To each their own.
In the spirit of the OP, though, I'll ask: who needs 200 budget knives? Or 50? Or 20? 5 different knives of varying styles and sizes should fill every need, so why the extras?
In terms of wise spending, you may get much of your 2500$ back if only one or two of your 5 nice knives are heavy users. The 2500$ heap of budget badness, on the other hand, is a tough sell.
I don't actually care to make any converts. If you're happy with that Gerber or CRKT, that's fine, those knives have their place. Judging others for their purchases seems rooted in insecurity. You're trying to convince others to more easily convince yourself, fishing for approval. Fishing for approval is fine, Trolling for approval is not.![]()
Different people seek different things, but that doesn't answer the OP question, does it?