I'll still disagree. INFI is better. I think it'd be more accurate to say that most people won't use a knife in such a way that the superior properties of INFI will be noticed, so it doesn't matter to them. I've never had any more trouble sharpening INFI with bench stones and strops -- same as I do A2/O1/1095/5160, etc.
I'll give you the sometimes poor sharpening from Busse. I've had some come really sharp and some dull as hell.
OK, but realize that bushcraft is not the intended purpose of most of his blades. Busse Combat, not Busse Bushcraft. It's like saying an M60 is a poor squirrel gun. Well, yes, but that's not what it was meant for. On the other hand, most of them CAN be used for such.
The Hellrazor:
Has to be one of the most obviously combat-oriented blades there is. Yet, when I thought out of the box, and tried it in bushcraft, I find it works quite well.
Thick spines? That matters only depending on the rest of the geometry. Take the Fusion Battle Mistress:
Yep, it has a 1/4" spine. BUT, if you measure the thickness of the blade at the same height as the total height of an Aurora, they are nearly the same, with the Aurora being slightly
thicker.
Often the difference between what you get from the factory and what makes it a good woods blade is sharpening the factory toothy edge to a more polished edge -- with the same bevel angle.
I dont care if people like Busse, I dont care if they dont, what gets me is the cult like status in the knife industry. How the fanboys come out of the woodwork defending the blades and maker they choose to use, and dogpiling those who dont like what they like, or see what they see. Lots of companies get this. BRKT, ESEE, Becker, Busse......My thing is use what you like, and if you dont like it, pass it up. However dont jump on people saying they are haters(not you as much as others), because they disagree with what they see, and their opinions of the Manufacturer, and the price point, or what they see as good features and not so good features of a bushcraft knife.