Originally posted by swede79
Yvsa wrote:
"But then I believe a man ought to be able to own and shoot a Bazooka if he wanted one"
I couldn't agree with you more. I personally love Kraton on my CS knives, and think stag is ugly. I get flamed sometimes, but too bad. It's what I think, and what I like.
From what I've read, the original Bowie(s) looked like overgrown kitchen knives, and the later ones had all the nice curves. I still think that the Western W49 is the nicest looking Bowie I've ever seen, and perhaps not the most practical or the best performer, but I like it! YMMV.
(P.S. There is NO such thing as an ugly Khukuri!!!)
"(P.S. There is NO such thing as an ugly Khukuri!!!)"
Swede I have one of those cheap India Janawar Katnes that I bet even you would say is ugly!!!!LMRRAO!!!!
I'm even more surprised since I've learned a bit about khukuris that it wasn't chrome plated!!!!
"But I like it!!!!"
And that's the reason there are so many styles of knives no matter whether a Bowie, Khukuri or whatever lays
between!!!!
It doesn't matter which I think is ugly or beautiful and I wouldn't let either stop me from getting any kind of knife.
After all I did wind up with a UBE due to my younger Bro Finn's enthusiasm.

My main consideration in buying a knife is if it is useable for me. Hell I know there's no man that can use all the khukuris I have, but the bottom line is that given the opportunity I would use each and every one of them for some task or another.
And as pretty as I think they are I wouldn't have any practical use for one of the Ontario Bowies. But in reality if I could get a really good deal like Kmark did that might have just enough arm twisting to make me buy one.
I have some other knives I bought 'just because' that have no practical use.

They do however have some historical meaning.
I have one of the Case made 'Western W49's' and I rather like it myself. Sorta an all around conception of what most people think a Bowie should look like.
I'm not real sure just how many companies made this style of Bowie.
Mine's one of the impractical ones as it has the brass back pinned in place from the sharpened clip back to the brass guard. (I think the clip is sharpened on that one, it's been awhile since I had it out.

)
And those brass backs have to be one of the phonyiest things I've ever seen!!!!
Yea, it does the job of keeping a sharpened edge from slideing down the blade and perhaps cutting the wielder, but it's otherwise worthless IMO.
If I were really gonna use the knife I would remove the brass and cut the guards of a bit, probably take the top one off to the handle.
Dayumed sure makes it more versatile as well as a more efficeient fighting knife.
Swede for me the jury is still out on the rubber handle knives. I agree that it's fairly comfortable for short time use, but I find it chafeing for long term use.
I swore I would never buy another rubber handled knife and yet I got a Busse Basic #9 that I'm Reeeaaalll FOND of!!!!

My main complaint with the rubber is that moisture can and does get under it causeing rust problems. (Hasn't happened with the Busse yet, but would expect it to be no different.)
At least it has on my Trailmaster and SRK. I do like the Carbon V though.
And when it's had a really nice thourough cold blue job done on it the 'instant' rust problem just about goes away.
One of these days I will get around to putting the old Christmas Tree Micarta slabs on my Traimaster with a new steel guard, the way it should have been to begin with IMO.

I keep a lot of rust preventive sprayed under the handles of my few CS knives.
Kinda strange too as there was a time I didn't like stag either. I thought it was too brittle to make good knife handles from.
And now I love stag for it's durability. I do agree that not all stag is pretty, actually to me some stag handles don't have what it takes to move me.
Bone is an entirely different story!!!! I love some bone handles as much as I do Ivory and in some instances would prefer it on a working knife.
