All right... now I'm just playing here... I always admire your steady hand on the tiller.
But I have to ask; did you infract yourself or just give yourself a warning?
I'm sorry... I had to ask!
I agree with all think CASE should do what it needs to if it means staying in business. No reason not to. They have a responsibility to their investors, to their workers, all the technicians, marketers, to the people that rely on sales of their products, and on and on. I can't imagine NO Case knives.
I never like to see anyone be too hypocritical about the origins of their knives. I happily buy knives from Italy, Japan, Taiwan (Kershaw and Ontario) without a second thought. But last time I checked I didn't see them on our USA map.
Nor any of the fine knives from France, Finland, Sweden, and even some from Argentina.
I think that any manufacturer of any product has an enormous task just staying in business these days in this highly competitive global market. I don't envy any of them for having to make the tough choices they all must face when just trying to stay afloat. Especially when talking about manufacturing completely non-essential luxury items like fine pocket knives.
I know they make a few great working knives, but it seems they are more into the collectibles these days. That has to be a
tough market.
And can you imagine what this economy has done to their bottom line? Yikes!
I think that if this move helps their bottom line enough to keep their particular style of knives in manufacture then it is probably a good thing. I can't imagine it was a decision made lightly as they certainly know that their purchasers feel a certain amount of ownership of the CASE brand.
Good business decisions aren't always popular, but can certainly be prudent. I will be interesting to see how this turns out. Good, I hope.
Robert