Cross_Steel2
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2003
- Messages
- 39
I want to start this by saying I've never used a knife in an offensive/physical manner against a human being. I have "finished off" deer with my Benchmade AFCK or used a stick and Blackjack copy of a Randall to finish off coyotes when bow hunting.
And no this is not Lynn Thompson!!!
Karambit folders for the most part have around a two inch blade and would technically be consider legal even under the most draconian knife laws. Is this partly fueling the popularity? Knife laws for the most part limit the lenght of the blade. Shorter blade lengths mean less penetration through thick clothing or the body cavity.
Most of the karambit crowd would have to admit given the choice of their favorite larger fixed blade knife or a karambit when SHTF. Espcially when your opponent is wearing thick clothing (one of those gansta types with his over-sized Oakland Raiders jacket) or is a thick skinned (wild pig or feral dog).
The karambit originated in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines. Whenever I think of these people I see them wearing thin or little clothing. A small knife with good ripping capabilities would be a good weapon.
Propell yourself to the United States in the year 2003. It's getting cold this time of year. In a defensive confrentation who will be your opponnent? Maybe probably one of those ganster types. Well what will they be wearing? Pants that are about 3 sizes to big for them. Jeans like that could "Choke Out" the cutting capability of a short blade. Jacket(Oakland Raiders or another team) that's 3 sizes to big. Makes it easy to conceal weapons, drugs that they're selling, plus makes it difficult to get cut. A thick "bogan" helps keep the head warm while standing on the street corner and help ward off blunt or sharp objects.
(NOTE: Depending on how high they are on the food chain they could be wearing body armor. But let's throw this variable out.)
Just with this regular winter homeboy clothing you've taken away %80 of your target area with a short bladed knife. Throw in a hockey mask and you've really got a problem.
Offensively how good are they. Varies widely, but if they've been surviving on the streets since they were 9 years old they'll be surprising ruthless. Remember the U.S. Military found this out about the gang bangers in Somolia.
Are Karambits becoming popular simply because of the Knife Laws in the U.S. ?
I don't own a karambit and haven't had a chance to handle one. In all the blade publications. The knife seems to have a mystical hold on people or be scorned and ridiculled by others. Yes the knife does have a fierce look. When I went to DC two years ago (a week before 9-11) I carried a Benchmade "Big Spender" into the White House and into Congress. In fact I went through a whole bunch of security and nothing was ever said about it. It had under a 3 inch blade and was completely legal. In fact on the White House tour brochure it said no knives with over a 3 inch lenght. I carried it on the entire tour. The knife does not have a fierce appearance but is razor sharp. Karambit would legally fall along these lines according to the letter of the law.
Just looking at things logically. Anybody have a difference of opinion feel free to express it.
And no this is not Lynn Thompson!!!
Karambit folders for the most part have around a two inch blade and would technically be consider legal even under the most draconian knife laws. Is this partly fueling the popularity? Knife laws for the most part limit the lenght of the blade. Shorter blade lengths mean less penetration through thick clothing or the body cavity.
Most of the karambit crowd would have to admit given the choice of their favorite larger fixed blade knife or a karambit when SHTF. Espcially when your opponent is wearing thick clothing (one of those gansta types with his over-sized Oakland Raiders jacket) or is a thick skinned (wild pig or feral dog).
The karambit originated in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines. Whenever I think of these people I see them wearing thin or little clothing. A small knife with good ripping capabilities would be a good weapon.
Propell yourself to the United States in the year 2003. It's getting cold this time of year. In a defensive confrentation who will be your opponnent? Maybe probably one of those ganster types. Well what will they be wearing? Pants that are about 3 sizes to big for them. Jeans like that could "Choke Out" the cutting capability of a short blade. Jacket(Oakland Raiders or another team) that's 3 sizes to big. Makes it easy to conceal weapons, drugs that they're selling, plus makes it difficult to get cut. A thick "bogan" helps keep the head warm while standing on the street corner and help ward off blunt or sharp objects.
(NOTE: Depending on how high they are on the food chain they could be wearing body armor. But let's throw this variable out.)
Just with this regular winter homeboy clothing you've taken away %80 of your target area with a short bladed knife. Throw in a hockey mask and you've really got a problem.
Offensively how good are they. Varies widely, but if they've been surviving on the streets since they were 9 years old they'll be surprising ruthless. Remember the U.S. Military found this out about the gang bangers in Somolia.
Are Karambits becoming popular simply because of the Knife Laws in the U.S. ?
I don't own a karambit and haven't had a chance to handle one. In all the blade publications. The knife seems to have a mystical hold on people or be scorned and ridiculled by others. Yes the knife does have a fierce look. When I went to DC two years ago (a week before 9-11) I carried a Benchmade "Big Spender" into the White House and into Congress. In fact I went through a whole bunch of security and nothing was ever said about it. It had under a 3 inch blade and was completely legal. In fact on the White House tour brochure it said no knives with over a 3 inch lenght. I carried it on the entire tour. The knife does not have a fierce appearance but is razor sharp. Karambit would legally fall along these lines according to the letter of the law.
Just looking at things logically. Anybody have a difference of opinion feel free to express it.