How... how is this possible? A “super steel” in a sub-$100 package?
https://www.bladehq.com/item--Kershaw-Link-Drop-Point-Knife-Olive--105987
https://www.bladehq.com/item--Kershaw-Link-Drop-Point-Knife-Olive--105987
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
How... how is this possible? A “super steel” in a sub-$100 package?
https://www.bladehq.com/item--Kershaw-Link-Drop-Point-Knife-Olive--105987
But I prefer both Sandvick and CPM D2 over 20cv for toughness.
Regarding KAI’s heat treatment, the Cedric and Ada YouTube channel tested ZT’s S35VN models. In some of the tests, their steel performed significantly worse (in terms of edge retention) compared to other manufacturers who also use S35VN.Lol, it costs that little because it's a Kershaw. It has the same amount of attention paid to it as the cheaper Links, but but with a blade steel that costs more to grind (and requires more care to perform an optimum heat treatment on). People are raving about these while completely ignoring the fact that the heat treat is the most important part of the performance of a knife steel, and that KAI doesn't seem to do a great job heat treating blades compared to other US manufacturers. Based on the cutting performance we've seen on KAI's M390/20CV, it performs as well as you could expect for a knife so cheap (ie. it doesn't perform that well, but what do you honestly expect for the money?).
Beware of buying a knife just for the steel. Especially at this price. How can you be sure the heat treat is up to snuff? Or the rest of the knife?
Those cost gotta be cut from somewhere.
I’m curious how Kershaw’s 20CV stacks up against Cold Steel’s, i.e. the 4-Max.If your only metric is that the knife performs fine, then I think it's going to do that for you. But there seems to be a difference in how Kershaw processes their 20CV and how, say, Spyderco does. This appears to be backed up by cutting tests, not just anecdotal observation.
Yeah I'm not sure why this doesn't seem to be more well-known. Tons of people just say their ZT knives have "always worked fine for them", as if that's in any way indicative of a good heat treatment. Their knives will hold an edge, sure, but not for as long as other knives in the same steels made with better heat treatments. When lower-end steels like BDN1, 52100, S30V/S35VN, or AUS-8 are outcutting ZT's 20CV at the same edge angle and finish, it should signal that maybe something about their 20CV is off.Regarding KAI’s heat treatment, the Cedric and Ada YouTube channel tested ZT’s S35VN models. In some of the tests, their steel performed significantly worse (in terms of edge retention) compared to other manufacturers who also use S35VN.
Definitely a dealbreaker for me. I’d suggest keeping the assist device. Detent is a matter of safety. I wouldn’t want a 1911 with a loose thumb safety.I have the Link in m390. This is not a good knife to deassist. I did this with mine and found that there is no detent.
Is this your experience as well with ZT knives?Yeah I'm not sure why this doesn't seem to be more well-known. Tons of people just say their ZT knives have "always worked fine for them", as if that's in any way indicative of a good heat treatment. Their knives will hold an edge, sure, but not for as long as other knives in the same steels made with better heat treatments. When lower-end steels like BDN1, 52100, S30V/S35VN, or AUS-8 are outcutting ZT's 20CV at the same edge angle and finish, it should signal that maybe something about their 20CV is off.
Cold Steel tends to do a great job with heat treatment. I haven't seen any of their 20CV tested, but I know that their XHP punched well above its weight class.I’m curious how Kershaw’s 20CV stacks up against Cold Steel’s, i.e. the 4-Max.