Alright had to grind off the washers and used 3 washers in the end. It originally had 4 washers. 2 thin, 2 thicker. The numbers are not entirely accurate as the calipers I used are not calibrated but should be close enough to understand what happened.
Basically 4 washers meant the front of the scales had more spacing between the scales than the back of the handle around .010-.014" thicker at the front over the back (was .174"~ or just about, the difference in thickness between predicted washers/spacing between the knife could be attributed to the heavy burring of the washers hell if I know). Minuscule difference that translates into a lot of stress to the TI. This means the titanium will likely permanently deform over time. Based on the thickness of the blade stock, and spacing, the washers accumulated about .059". I removed one of the smaller washers which I believe are around .010mm" while the thicker ones are about .020"
So basically it seems the actual spacing between scales should be around .1595" +- .0005"
What ended up happening: Ground approximately .003" from one of the thicker presentation washer, and about .070" from the framelock side (totally .013"~, and around .001" from one of the thinner ones giving me a total of approximately .014"+- .01" from the thinner washer that was removed).
What doesn't seem to make sense is the before/after. I calculated about .06" in washer thickness with all four. Removed a total of around .024" from the washer thickness. If my original guess of .060 was right I should end up with about .036". What I actually ended up with was about a .041" washer thickness.
Where the hell did .005 miscalculation come from? Possible the fact that the measure of the spacing between the scales was likely thrown off by .005" because I can't get it completely perpendicular. This is why 3d laser measurement tools are awesome.
In any case both the front and back now measure a cool .1595"~. I had to take it apart quite a few times.