- Joined
- Oct 8, 1998
- Messages
- 8,917
TRAV,
That is a reality, but there is another reality as well. The revolver did, in a very real way, cancel out the popularity of the Bowie, dirk, dagger, push knife (dagger) and sword cane.
It was not necessarily that the Bowie knife was deadlier than the Colt, it was that "Polite Society" was very squeamish about people having their head hanging on by a thread of muscle or their entrails dragging behind them after the engagement.
Someone in a Soldier of Fortune article wrote about that as well, it was either Bagwell or Chuck Karwan, I would have to dig out the old issues. It was called, "Mutually Assured Destruction."
So, it had alot to do with how "Polite Society" perceived the use of the Bowie and not exactly that it was deadlier.
That is said with the caveat that I do think they are at least the equal of modern handguns and possibly surpassed early handguns in lethality, mostly because of advancements in bullet design.
The Bowie most certainly had an advantage over single shot or even multi-shot handguns that were en vogue at the zenith of the Bowie's popularity. As those handguns evolved into better designs, they were multi-shot revolvers, but still misfired. Then that was improved upon as well with case ammunition and the demise of muzzleloaders. You know the story.
That is a reality, but there is another reality as well. The revolver did, in a very real way, cancel out the popularity of the Bowie, dirk, dagger, push knife (dagger) and sword cane.
It was not necessarily that the Bowie knife was deadlier than the Colt, it was that "Polite Society" was very squeamish about people having their head hanging on by a thread of muscle or their entrails dragging behind them after the engagement.
Someone in a Soldier of Fortune article wrote about that as well, it was either Bagwell or Chuck Karwan, I would have to dig out the old issues. It was called, "Mutually Assured Destruction."
So, it had alot to do with how "Polite Society" perceived the use of the Bowie and not exactly that it was deadlier.
That is said with the caveat that I do think they are at least the equal of modern handguns and possibly surpassed early handguns in lethality, mostly because of advancements in bullet design.
The Bowie most certainly had an advantage over single shot or even multi-shot handguns that were en vogue at the zenith of the Bowie's popularity. As those handguns evolved into better designs, they were multi-shot revolvers, but still misfired. Then that was improved upon as well with case ammunition and the demise of muzzleloaders. You know the story.