Knife discrimination

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ownership & Availabity are not exactly the same thing.

I understand that but how many shooting situations could be replaced by finding your target, stealing a car, having it work out perfect to where you can hit them, then get away fairly fast?

Yeah a car may be available but it’s not as convenient as getting a gun and running up to a person and shooting them at almost any free opportunity.

Easier of the 3 options is probably a good old fashioned stabbing though (since this is a knife forum lol)
 
Maybe the solution is buying a 1985 Suburban, installing a large brushguard, and attaching a bunch of smatchets to the brushguard. Or:

 
Go walk the streets of the downtown areas where there’s 10 shootings a night and find out how many people out walking there own cars vs guns. I bet you would get shown 5 handguns before you saw 5 sets of car keys
Those are downtown areas. Let’s pay attention to the context here. All of the developed world is not one large downtown area.
 
Take Danke's tank, for instance...
giphy.gif
 
Those are downtown areas. Let’s pay attention to the context here. All of the developed world is not one large downtown area.

Just because cars are widely available, they aren’t feasible as a weapon for most violent crimes. Its not very often someone just wants to drive at random and hit people. Most violent crime isn't done at random.
 
Just because cars are widely available, they aren’t feasible as a weapon for most violent crimes. Its not very often someone just wants to drive at random and hit people. Most violent crime isn't done at random.
While I might not go through with it, I often randomly want to mow down the idiots on Michigan Avenue. Violent crime done at random is the most fun because no one expects it, not even you.
 
I have a good friend, who has family down there, ... believes this mostly applies to younger city folk, but out in any rural areas this isn't the perception. Anyone working around a farm always has something and it's never a big deal.
Probably true. I've only ever lived in big cities. Of course that doesn't keep criminals from having knives and weapons in the cities. Good ones too.
 
I think you may have a definition of "racist" that differs from how the term is generally used. If, for example, a specific group of people (based solely on race/color/creed/ethnic background) were prohibited by law to posess knives, then yes, that knife law would be racist. But I don't think that's what you're talking about.

"Racism" is just one category under Discrimination. I believe what you are saying, is that some people discrimate against knife owners. Definitely they do, same as towards gun owners. And just like firearms, there is an increased fear level if the knife is tactical/military/weapon-like/black as opposed to a "tool" even if the same thing can be accomplished with both. The fear level also increases with blade length, even though a 4 inch blade can be just as effective a weapon as a 7inch one, and perhaps even moreso because of concealability.

But while "racism" is the not the correct word, there lies the common denominator in all forms of discrimination, ignorance and the fear that it spawns. Just as when one learns about guns, there is no fear of the gun itself, the same applies to knives. The only thing to "fear", if called for, is the person wielding what is nothing more than a tool.

In just about every country there are knife laws and many have become very strict, mostly through kneejerk reactions to incidents of criminal use.
Recent history of political activism has seen ridiculous overuse of "racism " where the actual core problem of social discrimination is more broadly based in class / economic status .

Who is allowed and has the means to legally obtain and carry weapons . Who legally owns fully automatic , suppressed weapons , etc . Even today it sure ain't the poor folks . And who can afford to buy the best legal help and influence the cops and courts to go easy if they do get into any trouble ? Wealthy , powerful , well connected and protected .
 
Recent history of political activism has seen ridiculous overuse of "racism " where the actual core problem of social discrimination is more broadly based in class / economic status .

Who is allowed and has the means to legally obtain and carry weapons . Who legally owns fully automatic , suppressed weapons , etc . Even today it sure ain't the poor folks . And who can afford to buy the best legal help and influence the cops and courts to go easy if they do get into any trouble ? Wealthy , powerful , well connected and protected .
You are right that the roots of Social Discrimination lies in Economic/Class status. But while racism in the U.S. was tied to that for most of it's history, today in the 21st century I see racism existing independent of those roots. True, the term "racism" itself has become highly overused, as evidenced in the OP's original post. But I wrote that off as simply an error, like confusing "socialist" for "sociologist".

As far as I am aware, and while recognizing that laws vary from State to State, I believe that in most cases "anyone" regardless of race,color or creed can legally apply for a weapon (firearm), except in places where nobody can apply for one.* Acceptance of the application will again, depend on the jurisdiction, and on other factors such as a criminal/felony record. As for full autos, I believe there are two methods, one involving getting an FFL and the other a more difficult and costly method. I'm not up on suppressors but I understand that they are legal for private citizens to own in 42 of the 50 states, despite being regulated by the BATF. And yes, good legal representation costs money. Im many cases lots of money depending on the issue at hand. As for "influencing" law enforcement and Courts, while I certainly can't deny it happens, I don't believe it's very easy even for those who are wealthy.

So if a Michelin 5-star French restaurant refuses to let me in because I couldn't pay the bill before, am I being discriminated against?

* The States of NY and NJ will issue hangun permits to foreigners. However CT requires US citizenship. This is an example of a discriminatory policy.
 
Went thru that with both my Parents....
This is your wife........I'll say a for you both.
Hopefully Bladeforums can give you a little enjoyment at this very difficult time.
Thanks for the kind words. After 40 years with me: she's a real fighter! That attitude can certainly be an asset now...
 
I have no patience for narrow minded lack of critical thinking.

Best approach is to laugh at them. This is how Ronaldus Magnus handled kooky leftists. If you try to engage them with reason - a futile endeavor - you give them gravitas and treat them as equals. By laughing at and dismissing them as fools, you deprive them of the one thing they crave most in this world - your serious attention.

VIN5BWF.jpg
 
Thanks for the kind words. After 40 years with me: she's a real fighter! That attitude can certainly be an asset now...
I intended to say I will say a prayer for you both......forgot to add prayer.
Old hands......small phone keyboard.......LOL
 
As for "influencing" law enforcement and Courts, while I certainly can't deny it happens, I don't believe it's very easy even for those who are wealthy.
Believe what you like . My actual first hand experience says different .

But here's not the place to expand on these issues . :)
 
Best approach is to laugh at them. This is how Ronaldus Magnus handled kooky leftists. If you try to engage them with reason - a futile endeavor - you give them gravitas and treat them as equals. By laughing at and dismissing them as fools, you deprive them of the one thing they crave most in this world - your serious attention.

VIN5BWF.jpg
Loved the work he did in Point Break!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top