I know it isn't strictly on topic, but since we're talking about bear defense some of you may be interested. This is a long video but well worth watching if you travel in bear country. This guy knows his stuff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PExlT-5VU-Y&feature=youtu.be
I know it isn't strictly on topic, but since we're talking about bear defense some of you may be interested. This is a long video but well worth watching if you travel in bear country. This guy knows his stuff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PExlT-5VU-Y&feature=youtu.be
This is over an hour long, and fifteen minutes in there has been more academic jibber jabber and bad jokes than anything else. No real advice and just bad anecdotes of his condescension towards the common folk.
I'm going to guess the Kochanski 7 minute video is much better. I'll watch the rest of it though and note any of the useful information below.
There has been research on deterrents for years:
http://www.bearbiology.com/fileadmin/tpl/Downloads/URSUS/Vol_5/Miller_Vol_5.pdf
This study suggests that the only item which worked, albeit temporarily, in a charge each time was a sheet of plywood. And the spray as well.
Edit: After 17 minutes or so the actual presentation starts and it is quite good. No new information really but some of the data is interesting and confirms a lot of the books and pamphlets that have been around. Most interesting is the injuries related to guns and that likelihood of a violent encounter goes down where there are more bears. Makes sense really as the wound could cause a bear to go into fight for survival mode, and in dense populations they would more commonly be warding each other off.
The data tests for charges were 75 metres and 400 metres (brown bears, temperamental bears for the latter), as opposed to what Kochanski says for 50 yards and 100 yards (black bears, mother at 100).
The spray practise is also a good idea. Good video, just didn't like his condescending talk at the beginning.
This is over an hour long, and fifteen minutes in there has been more academic jibber jabber and bad jokes than anything else. No real advice and just bad anecdotes of his condescension towards the common folk.
I'm going to guess the Kochanski 7 minute video is much better. I'll watch the rest of it though and note any of the useful information below.
There has been research on deterrents for years:
http://www.bearbiology.com/fileadmin/tpl/Downloads/URSUS/Vol_5/Miller_Vol_5.pdf
This study suggests that the only item which worked, albeit temporarily, in a charge each time was a sheet of plywood. And the spray as well.
Edit: After 17 minutes or so the actual presentation starts and it is quite good. No new information really but some of the data is interesting and confirms a lot of the books and pamphlets that have been around. Most interesting is the injuries related to guns and that likelihood of a violent encounter goes down where there are more bears. Makes sense really as the wound could cause a bear to go into fight for survival mode, and in dense populations they would more commonly be warding each other off.
The data tests for charges were 75 metres and 400 metres (brown bears, temperamental bears for the latter), as opposed to what Kochanski says for 50 yards and 100 yards (black bears, mother at 100).
The spray practise is also a good idea. Good video, just didn't like his condescending talk at the beginning.
Great post, one of the best this whole thread! :thumbup:
But what if life and death hinge on you subscribing to a what if question with an elaborately constructed scenario? Would it fly with you then?I don't know. I don't subscribe to the "there are no stupid questions" philosophy.
Those "what if" questions where the person asking constructs an elaborate and leading scenario don't fly with me.
But what if life and death hinge on you subscribing to a what if question with an elaborately constructed scenario? Would it fly with you then?
As long as "realistic" doesn't mean very likely only but could include remotely possible scenarios I believe I could come up with something.Can you cite a realistic example of a life or death scenario with elaborately constructed hinge points?
One's I've heard sound like the plot summary for Under Siege & they definitely weren't asked by a Navy SEAL who was running out the clock as a cook on a battleship.
I don't remember much from that Navy Seal. I believe he liked throwing knives and cooked lighter fluid with a metal sponge in a microwave? [emoji2]
Or something more likely if you want. What if your boss asks you weird elaborate what if questions. Would you at least pretend to take them serious (provided you need the job to stay alive)
I have trouble matching Willy Wonka with what I remember of that movie which is a good excuse to see it again after so many years.He was like a dark haired Willy Wonka.
Work is actually very much cut to the chase.