Easy there, amigo.
I don' think anyone here is getting their personal knickers in a twist over a name. The point is that a stupid name for a knife is a stupid name for a knife. Perceptions matter. Its not infringing on anyone's freedom. The marketing department thought it was some cool badass and scary name. It has nothing to do with the knife, but it DOES reflect on our hobby.
As knife enthusiasts, our bit is not to get bent out of shape over perceived affronts to our freedoms. Our job is to be good ambassadors of our hobby and bear the brunt of understanding that many people are woefully ignorant to the good of our passion. Part of the gig is being honest with ourselves and calling out inflammatory stupidity when it pops up. It is simply foolish to name a knife Death on Contact. Any knife used "correctly" for such a job would result in "death on contact". There is nothing special about that knife other than the marketing department wanted to be provocative. It puts money in the coffers of the manufacturer who catering to some high speed, low drag types (or types playing the part), but it does nothing to help our cause with society that knives are tools, art, and part of the collective culture.