the thinnest one is .006" behind the edge with around a 22 degrees or less inclusive edge.
Hot damn!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
the thinnest one is .006" behind the edge with around a 22 degrees or less inclusive edge.
ive seen alot of reccomendations on here. all stuff like Cold Steel, sebenzas, spyderco, benchmade, stryder... etc.
these may be nice knives, but that stuff is EXPENSIVE!
whats wrong with brands like:
Buck
Gerber
Kershaw
Case
Schrade
Winchester
and knives along that whole spectrum. i guess i dont see why people wouldnt wanna have just a normal knife listed here. i carry a Victorinox, so i guess im in the middle. are these middle-priced knives just hated?
ive seen alot of reccomendations on here. all stuff like Cold Steel, sebenzas, spyderco, benchmade, stryder... etc.
these may be nice knives, but that stuff is EXPENSIVE!
whats wrong with brands like:
Buck
Gerber
Kershaw
Case
Schrade
Winchester
and knives along that whole spectrum. i guess i dont see why people wouldnt wanna have just a normal knife listed here. i carry a Victorinox, so i guess im in the middle. are these middle-priced knives just hated?
Like Ankerson said, I was not referring to production knives, and in other post I specifically mentioned that most of the time factory HT and edge are nowhere near the optimum for high end steels.I have a few questions. It sounded like Gator earlier stated that 15 inclusive edge was still an obtuse one? Maybe I read that wrong. And it sounds like 100 dollar knives are now considered low end like the P2? ...
Like Ankerson said, I was not referring to production knives, and in other post I specifically mentioned that most of the time factory HT and edge are nowhere near the optimum for high end steels.
Part of the reason is cost savings for manufacturers and part of the reason(or blame if you will) is on the users. Some will complain about no significant gains or sharpening problems, others will damage edges, or break knives etc... E.g. one of the common complaints about Shun knives I've heard and seen is broken tips. Compared to western knives they are fairly thin and considerably harder ~61HRc, which isn't the heardest out there, and still, people toss them into the sinks, drop them on the floor and then blame Shun for broken knives, when in fact all they really have to blame is their own neglect and abuse of the knives.
As for the specific angle, not every steel can take 10 or 12 per side, even considering the use. Thickness behind the edge, angle, and HT, RC all matter. There is not one single factor to determine what makes high performance knife. Although, if a knife can sustain 5-10 per side working edge, obviously it is a very good performer.
Anyhow, the discussion was about 400$ and more expensive knives and that's the performance I can get for that price. Even for expensive production knives, there is a lot to gain by rehardening and regrinding. My benchmade M2 710 went from ~59HRC to 64HRC and thinned down. Performance increase in both cutting ability and edge holding are very significant. Kershaw CPM 110V shallot, also went form 58HRC to 64-65HRC. Thinned down the blade, benefits are even greater and so on. Obviously, I had to pay for regrinding, rehardening and all that. Brings the price up.
I did all that because I knew (learned during the years of collecting) I'd gain a lot in terms of performance and cutting ability and to me that's what those knives were about. I really don't see a point in having 20 mediocre knives, I'd rather have a few top performers. I carry those knives and really enjoy using them because they can perform at those levels.
The problem is, those who accuse others of being a snobs, do not really know what is the performance difference and based on that ignorance make statements which basically boils down to "I don't need that sort of performance, so you must be a snob". Really?
ive seen alot of reccomendations on here. all stuff like Cold Steel, sebenzas, spyderco, benchmade, stryder... etc.
these may be nice knives, but that stuff is EXPENSIVE!
whats wrong with brands like:
Buck
Gerber
Kershaw
Case
Schrade
Winchester
and knives along that whole spectrum. i guess i dont see why people wouldnt wanna have just a normal knife listed here. i carry a Victorinox, so i guess im in the middle. are these middle-priced knives just hated?
Like Ankerson said, I was not referring to production knives, and in other post I specifically mentioned that most of the time factory HT and edge are nowhere near the optimum for high end steels.
Part of the reason is cost savings for manufacturers and part of the reason(or blame if you will) is on the users. Some will complain about no significant gains or sharpening problems, others will damage edges, or break knives etc... E.g. one of the common complaints about Shun knives I've heard and seen is broken tips. Compared to western knives they are fairly thin and considerably harder ~61HRc, which isn't the heardest out there, and still, people toss them into the sinks, drop them on the floor and then blame Shun for broken knives, when in fact all they really have to blame is their own neglect and abuse of the knives.
As for the specific angle, not every steel can take 10 or 12 per side, even considering the use. Thickness behind the edge, angle, and HT, RC all matter. There is not one single factor to determine what makes high performance knife. Although, if a knife can sustain 5-10 per side working edge, obviously it is a very good performer.
Anyhow, the discussion was about 400$ and more expensive knives and that's the performance I can get for that price. Even for expensive production knives, there is a lot to gain by rehardening and regrinding. My benchmade M2 710 went from ~59HRC to 64HRC and thinned down. Performance increase in both cutting ability and edge holding are very significant. Kershaw CPM 110V shallot, also went form 58HRC to 64-65HRC. Thinned down the blade, benefits are even greater and so on. Obviously, I had to pay for regrinding, rehardening and all that. Brings the price up.
I did all that because I knew (learned during the years of collecting) I'd gain a lot in terms of performance and cutting ability and to me that's what those knives were about. I really don't see a point in having 20 mediocre knives, I'd rather have a few top performers. I carry those knives and really enjoy using them because they can perform at those levels.
The problem is, those who accuse others of being a snobs, do not really know what is the performance difference and based on that ignorance make statements which basically boils down to "I don't need that sort of performance, so you must be a snob". Really?
the thinnest one is .006" behind the edge with around a 22 degrees or less inclusive edge.
ETA: That Phil Wilson above must be the model the Spyderco Southfork is based off?
that knife is sexy :thumbup: :thumbup:
i doubt most people can comprehend how thin that knife is ground to. to give people an idea, a sheet of standard copy paper is .003, your phil custom is as thick as 2 sheets copy paper behind the edge bevel. my eyes are getting cut just looking at it
.
We often have different parameters in a folder. I don't buy $500.00 folders because : 1. I can't afford them. The wife and I have three+ degrees between us and continuing, which is a constant resource drain. 2. I have many interests\hobbies competing for my disposable income. 3. I am primarily interested in outdoor cutting tool use and prioritize performance over aesthetics. If a $50.00 dollar machete performs well I see no practical need to buy one for $100.00., analogous to a folding knife.
When I started metal detecting I bought a decent beginners machine after researching the topic. I did well with that machine and still have it. After a few years I bought a machine that cost roughly three times that of my first detector. The performance of the new machine left my original for dead. So yes I can understand and appreciate why an individual will buy a high end folder. But my personal parameters for a folder are practical performance within a realistic budget. So I do not have $500.00 folders for various reasons. If I won a lottery would I buy super expensive folders ? Probably. But I can't\wont. And it is not a priority for me. Is it knife snobbery when I see someone happily revealing a high quality folder purchase ? Probably not. I know that I get a tinge of jealousy now and then though because I'll likely never own blade X, at least not for a while. Or have to save and put real effort into getting it. Meanwhile, I buy Spyderco, Cold Steel, Ka-Bar, Kershaw folders and have a hell of a lot of fun with them. They cut branches and gut fish just fine. There seems to be a multitude of factors influencing a knife buy. I am pretty comfortable with mine most times as they fit my use patterns. If you can afford a $500.00 folder and appreciate it for its stellar tolerances, materials and workmanship, then good for you bud. Few things in life are black or white, many are various shades of grey. Enjoy your folders and have a wonderful day.![]()
You make an excellent point and bear out what I wanted my first post to say. And that is it is all about disposable income. You can see snobbery against high end knives, as Ankerson mentioned, and against low end knives, as it cuts both way's. But as I said this is not the norm on BF that I have seen.
The fact that we are all limited to what we can spend for our hobbies, and knives are really my only hobby, should not allow snobbery to creep in. After my divorce I found out that my disposable income would now allow me to spend more, to buy some customs along the way, and this is what I have done, but the customs don't cut better than a well sharpened $50 to $100 knife. Now the edge may last longer, but for my needs I don't require a super steel because I don't need to cut very much day in and day out. But because I can afford the higher cost of a $500 to $600 folder, and because I see a design that I'll never find in a production knife, I buy it. This does not make me a snob though, it just makes me a happy knife owner.
I don't see it as snobbery, just knowledgable enthusiasts who are more and more able to appreciate the differences that can be had with a more expensive knife. Of course, it's the law of diminishing returns: you can pay four times as much to get a knife 25% better. Nothing wrong with that if you appreciate that extra 25%.
I read a wine book where the author commented that anybody could buy a good wine at big prices He found satisfaction in finding good wines at cheap prices. That's where I'm at as a beginner knife collector: I like the good knives at low prices. I have a lot of Ka-Bar, Kershaw, Buck, Victorinox, and Mora in my collection.
to the people who go above the benchmade/zt bracket (i use these as an example because i consider them my high end) do you use your custom/exotic steel knives for every day tasks like you would something like a griptilian?