Sorry, should have been more clear, I have seen multiple blades advertized as being Seal tested and approved. Quite simply if Missions MPK and yours were part of the same test obviously both could not have scored top performance. I would be interested in what other blades the Seals had to compare against the WB's and BG. And if there was some kind of rating system and how the various blades did in each aspect.
Personally, having used your products and Missions (A2 MPK), it is not much of a choice at all. I had many problems with the MPK I had a loan of. To name a few, it rusted easily (just being out in damp weather for a few hours), the edge dented on wood, and I had concerns about tip strength (couldn't actually evaluate that as it wasn't mine).
Compare this to the performance of the PAB for example which not only has as equal as thin and edge but is longer and heavier (so the impact energies are higher). Last week, I used to it take down a couple of trees, limb them out, as well clear about 250 dead branches off the surrounding trees and the net effect was no significant edge degredation let alone visible damage. It was also wet and there was no visible corrosion produced.
The security of your cord wrap is also much greater than the grip on the MPK, there are durability benefits, but then again you offer G10 grips as well. On top of that Eagle Industries makes easily the most impressive sheaths I have seen in regards to quality of construction, durability, and functionality.
To be fair to Mission, the test knife was probably a Ti version of the MPK and not the A2 one I used, however I don't think that the Ti version would be stronger than the A2 one I used nor more compaction resistant. It obviously has the same grip and sheath so the same comments would apply.
Anyway, if you can find the tape I would like to buy a copy if possible.
-Cliff
[This message has been edited by Cliff Stamp (edited 03-12-2001).]