I got to agree with beef on this one. Sure I like knives, although I only own a few, but realistically, when day hiking and multiday backpacking, like what beef described, I can get by with my SAK.
But I do prefer to carry a 4 inch FB, which although I don't need, I still take it as I don't mind the extra weight, as I'm not a lightweight hiker.
Also
where I dayhike I don't need to baton wood, and make debris shelters etc... (not having a go at all those who do, I want to try making one myself one day), so I guess where I live and where everyone else lives, and their type of bush they hike in it might warrant a knife, BUT, if you in jungle, I'd want a machete, if I knew I was going to chop heaps of wood/wood at all, bring an axe, but in saying that...
I think if most people who said they need one, did a
dayhike as beef described, they wouldn't need one, Because they wouldn't need to stay another night, and if they were in the situations described in the first post, couldn't they just do what beef would have done?
Scenario1: I'm day hiking, stop for lunch, use my stove to make some tea, complete the walk with no problems. I always carry thermals/ fleece/ rain gear in a dry bag, plenty of water (up to 6L on a ridgetop walk) and esbit tabs/ stove.
Where's my need for a knife? If I couldn't get out that day, I'd be forced to put on my clothing, put on my rain gear, sit on my pack and wait out the night. If I was cold I'd stuff leaves in my jacket, find one of the innumerable caves on the side of the ridge protected from the wind. Or fire up the esbit.
Scenario 2: I'm on one of my multi day walks when I break a leg. I pull out my blue foam mat, hop in my sleeping bag and pull the tarp over the top if I can't set it up. If I'm solo with no mobile reception, I wait there till the TWO people I've told realise I'm overdue and alert the SES (State Emergency Service).
Use for a knife? Nada.
I think most people would do just fine in the above situations without a knife.
huh. of course you need a knife to go into the wild. as important as shoes. in a worst-case scenario, it can be your fire/shelter/food source.
what if you're pulled into the river you happen to be crossing, and your pack gets hung up?... you're being held under by a strong current, and don't have a knife to free yourself?...
Can I just ask, isn't it dangerous to cross a river that has a strong current, without putting a rope or some sort of line in place as a safety measure? If your alone, well then why would you cross a river with a strong current that will more than likely pull you under in the first place? Couldn't you find a shallower part/less current?
And assuming that the bottom of you pack is around your waist level, wouldnt this be as deep as you'd want to go, i.e. not up to your armpits? Or if you have to cross deeper, would you perhaps take you pack off and cross with it off, that way if it does get swept away/dragged under, your not taken with it.
some friends and i went to l.a. this past fall,(that's a real wilderness) and the only knife i had with me was a 2-blade old timer. nice and sharp. my nurse friend had a wicked blister open up, and an inch-diameter piece of skin hanging off her heel. she got to perform a minor self-surgery, and my irrational need to carry a knife on sunset strip was validated.
I'm gonna be a smartass here, but couldn't you do that with a nice and sharp SAK classic / any sak with a blade
But as I said above I will carry a knife, but I know that I can say, and am totally able to hike without one, or think I'm 'less of a man', as one post said for not carrying one, as my trusty SAK does me fine.
