A few that I have and thought I would like but just can't warm up to:
Seahorse Whittler -- I pick it up and think I might carry it, but then I just don't find it useful. The big, thick Wharncliffe blade would probably make a great utility knife, but that's not what I typically need, and I hate to relegate such a beautiful knife to that kind of task.
Copperhead -- I have two, both with Wharncliffe blades. I really like how they look, but they're just too big and bulky for me to enjoy carrying.
Mini Copperlock -- A beautiful knife (I have an early stag example), but there's something about the blade shape that bothers me. It's almost as if there's too much blade for the handle size.
What you might call an "Honorable Mention" goes to:
Copperlock (Wharncliffe version): I really wanted this one and finally tracked it down, and I do like the look of it, and I'm a big fan of Wharncliffe blades. But there's something about the big, single Wharncilffe blade that makes me think this one isn't as practicable as I had hoped. If I want to carry a single blade mid-lock knife of that size I'll more often pick up a Tribal Lock. Strangely enough, I find a single blade Wharncliffe Swayback Gent to be immensely useful!
Overall I would say that larger knives, no matter how nice they are and how much I want to like them, end up not appealing to me that much. For example, I will readily carry one of my Wharncliffe Mini Trappers, but my Wharncliffe Trapper is (as with the copperheads) too big and bulky to carry. But the full size Wharncliffe Trapper is an awesome slicer and I often pick it up for some kitchen work.
(Strange how often "Wharncliffe" is mentioned in this post. I wonder what that means? Some kind of love/hate relationship, perhaps...

)