Les Robertson

Status
Not open for further replies.
One last note. We didn't know that Les was going on vacation when he dropped this in our lap. Yes, it's bad timing on our part to remove him while he is gone, but that does not absolve him of following the rules, or of his culpability in making this mess to begin with.

Berating us on our timing has now gotten counter-productive. We've admitted we were in error, but this is getting ridiculous. It's at the point where I expect to see "Me Too!" comments.

You can draw comparisons to the other site all you want, but if you think hard enough you'll realize that that is an incorrect assumption, period. If you cannot recognize the difference, I'm sorry, I don't know how much more I can do to make it the difference between night and day.

Spark

------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com

Insert witty quip here
 
Cliff, I think you will find a higher number of locked threads within knifeforums than you will in bladeforums. I think Spark and Mike were more than ample in their warnings to Les. In fact, me not having been reading this subject picked the various warnings rather quickly and easily from one reading of all the threads involved. It was obvious to me that Spark was avoiding locking the thread as long as possible in fact he clearly stated that he was going to wait and see how the thread goes in direction first. Lee continued his rantings and ravings and the thread locked, correctly.

I agree to some point with Les about emersons recklesness of making promises that are undeliverable. But stating this once was enough and he could have referenced his comments to his initial statement every time and there would have been no objections.

I'm sure Les will return as moderator eventually, due to his knowledge and experience, but maybe a cooling off period is necessary.
 
The reason the thread was locked was not because of Les. I closed the thread because of lIllIl0l0's attack and it was obvious the thread was going nowhere productive.

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
www.wowinc.com




 
It is with great sadness that I read that Les was removed as moderator -- his forum was the number one reason that I frequent BladeForums.

While Les certainly went after Mr. Emerson with an extra amount of gusto, was there anything that he said that was not true? Has Emerson not delivered product when promised? Has he left his buyers in the dark? Does he continue to take custom orders that have little hope of being filled in the near future? Is Emerson going to contact all of his pending customers with an apology for the non-delivery? I doubt it.

I'll wager a guess that Mr. Turber will start distributing Emerson factory knives (or at least he is positioning as such) and the decision to remove Les was more business decision than him running the custom forums the "wrong" way. I'm sure any such arrangement with Emerson would have to include the silencing of such vocal folks as Mr. Robertson. Maybe I'm wrong, but why would Mike, as a successful businessman, endorse such poor business practices in the knife industry?

Whomever takes over the custom forum will have a tough act to follow, Mr. Robertson has fiddled everything that I've ever wondered about and while I didn't always agree with his colorful opinions, I certainly respected him and found him more often right than wrong.


--Doug
 
Doug, your wager is wrong. End of story. Before you start making unfounded speculation like that, and start seeing conspiracies where there are none, I'll thank you if you at least attempt to find out from the horse's mouth.

Ask me, or ask Mike if we are now, or are planning on being Emerson Distributors. You'll find that not only is that NOT the case, but there is a chance that we are moving in the *opposite* direction from that.

I'm getting really sick of the conspiracy talk, folks. Since Day 1 of BladeForums.com, we have been totally up front with you guys, and have stuck behind what we've said 110%. This hidden agenda and similar talk is nothing more than that, talk, and you know what they say about assumptions.

So, again, if you honestly and truly feel that we are "selling out" or are hiding things from you guys, bring it out into the open. Start a new thread. Let us attack it head on, and we'll be happy to give you the full details, provided they have a place in public.

Spark

------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com

Insert witty quip here
 
Doug,

I will take you up on that wager
smile.gif



------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
www.wowinc.com




 
Cobalt :

I think Spark and Mike were more than ample in their warnings to Les.

That is exactly the point. That kind of behavior is very poor administration. You don't do that kind of thing in public. If I was Les I would have been more more direct with Spark and not nearly as polite.

I agree to some point with Les about emersons recklesness of making promises that are undeliverable. But stating this once was enough and he could have referenced his comments to his initial statement every time and there would have been no objections.

That is a problem with him as a poster, not as a moderator. If he had deleted posts or locked threads that defended Emerson then that would have been an abuse of his moderating abilties.

And again, all such comments between administrators should be made in private. If I was running BladeForums, after reading the public comments by Spark to Les I would have immediately warned Spark never do that again and the second time removed his posting abilties. It does not matter if Les was out of line (which I don't think he was), you don't get into arguments in a public forum between adminstrators or between adminstrators and moderators, or between moderator and moderators.

Additionally, good moderators are not apathetic people. Bill Martino has very strong feelings about what makes a good khukuri and he posts it often whenever the subject comes up. Does this make him a bad moderator? No of course not. Bill's strong opinions do not inhibit his moderating abilities and neither would I expect them to do so.

Spark :

Who violated procedure, Cliff?

You, and badly. Does not matter if Les was out of line or not. You do not undermine his role as a moderator by critizing him in public. What ever he did after that, while indepently a problem, is excusable simply based on your initial posts throwing the rules out the window. While I would never have continued the debate in public with you if I was in Les's position, I can understand him doing so and would place no fault on him for doing it.

You don't like Les's removal?

Way to completely miss the point. I was not commenting on his removal but the way in which it was done. Since you and Mike do not want to make the facts public I cannot make an educated decision on if it was the right choice or not. And in any case since I don't run BladeForums it not my choice to make.

You want to make a difference? Volunteer for the advisory board.

One more example of a huge lack of experience. Anyone who volunteers for a position in which they have to make decisions like Les's removal is not someone you want to be there. People with the necessary experience will realize what it takes to do the job right and what the consequences are and will not want any part of it. There are exceptions to this as with everything of course.

If you want to carry out this type of debate with the moderators in this forum, create a private forum and only allow moderators and admins and such to read and post there. You can then work out all the problems and once they are resolved post the final decisions in the public forums.


Everything else is armchair quarterbacking.

Nice job there. As an admisistrator you are supposed to be held to a higher standard than a regular poster. You have less freedom not more. Not fair? That's life. You ciritize Les for doing something and then turn around and do the same thing yourself. Good form.

Why I am posting all of this anyway. Its not because of a personal problem I have with Mike or BladeForums. Its the exact opposite. This is a great place and it has many advantages of rec.knives. I would hate to see it suffer the same way KnifeForums did but this decision is directly parallel. Mike you are willing to hire someone with professional experience to run the site and Spark handles all the computer aspects very well and keeps that aspect smooth. You could also hire someone to handle decisions like Les's removal and other administrative tasks. It would make life much easier for you and it would make the site run a lot better. It would not have to be a full time position just a consulting one. You should have no problem locating someone with the necessary qualifications given your business experience and contacts.


-Cliff
 
Cliff, I agree that we do not want to end up with locking threads or deleting information like has happened in the other forum. This is the one thing I have always enjoyed about this forum over the other.

After thinking it over, you are right that warning or discussing what to post should have been done in private, to avoid embarrasment to either party. The old saying "back him into a corner and he will come out fighting" is quite true.

I think Mike and Spark are doing an excellent job with this forum, and I consider Les an invaluable moderator with incredible knowledge that will benefit us all. Guys, kiss and make up and let's get on with this. Mike and Spark, I hope that the removal of Less is only temporary and not permanent for a small infraction or difference in opinion. I would hate to see this forum go to hell in a handbasket over such minutiae, especially over someone we all know has excessively long waiting periods and a lot of people's money in hand( although you are all responsible adults who should know better than to give money away for a 3 or more year wait, no one is worth that).
 
Cliff, put succintly, I think you are wrong, and you think you are right.

Either way, one of the nice things about BladeForums.com is that we aren't as regimented and policy bound as the boards and committee's that you are used to.

You don't like how this was handled? Fine. Point noted, now move on to the next order of business. I don't like having been put in this place to begin with, but that's a different matter. You think I undermined Les's authority by telling him to back down? Fine, my view is by ignoring that warning, he undermined mine, and in the chain of command, I take precedence.

What you don't seem to get is when Mike or myself are forced to step in as a moderator, it's just like a sports game. If we make a decision that disagree's with what that moderator, at the end, ours is the final word. The second Les stepped into an argument as a poster, he took off his moderator hat. When I stepped in as a moderator, and I told him to step away and calm down, he should have listened as a poster, pure and simple. Proper procedure doesn't enter into it at that point.

We can argue back and forth all day about how it should have been handled, but again, it's all "armchair quarterbacking". If you feel you can make a positive difference, you are welcome to lend a hand. Otherwise, do us a favor follow your own (very good I might ad) advice: don't contribute to the problem by publically questioning our methods and where they are lacking when you yourself said that they should be done privately.

Spark

------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com

Insert witty quip here
 
OK Everyone calm down.

We screwed up! We know it, you know it and continueing this bickering is not going to help. I have instructed Spark to not say anymore on the subject and nor will I.

Now we have talked to Les and here is what we are willing to do. This question will be brought up to the new panel of advisors. They can make the decision about when and whether or not Les should come back as moderator. This is the most fair way I can think to handle this.

So let it die until they make the decision.

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
www.wowinc.com




 
Mike, by not backing down in the face of opposition you have shown your character, and by being willing to have another look at a decision you made you shown it even more, regardless of the outcome. As for calming down, this is just admin. business nothing personal. If I had seen you on the street yesterday I would just have asked you about the Dragon Forge line of knives. This stuff leaves my mind as soon as I leave the thread.

Spark:

Cliff, put succintly, I think you are wrong, and you think you are right.

Yeah, and one of thus does this for a living and one of us does not. I am not telling you what I think - I am telling you what I know. I didn't make any of this up. It's what I have been taught by people who are a lot more experienced than me and what I have seen happen more than once. If you don't agree with what I am saying then we can discuss the merits of various methods. This I would welcome feel free to send me an email pointing out any flaws in my logic or any other shortcoming in the points I have described. I don't use the same methods I use a year ago simply because I have been shown the faults of several points of view by people with more experience. That's fine and I am grateful for that. But simple "I am right and you are wrong" teaches nobody anything. As as for

don't contribute to the problem by publically questioning our methods and where they are lacking when you yourself said that they should be done privately.

Yes, between admins. The public has more freedom. The simple fact is in a public forum you can't expect to control what the public say (to an extent) so you have to be prepared for public complaints. However you can impose restrictions on the staff. The people who make the decisions do not have the same freedom of speech that the public does.

If for example I am sitting at a public meeting as a member of a board I have to be prepared to face critism from the public both directed towards me and towards the other members of the board. But I would never expect it from the other members. Regardless of my opinions on how the board members may have acted I would fully support their decisions in public, in private it would likely be another matter. If someone in public made a point and I saw enough merit showing that a member had acted improperly and needed to be dealt with, I would immediately make a motion to declare the meeting priviliged and we would deal with the matter in private. Once it was resolved the meeting would be opened to the public and the resolution stated with every member supporting the decision of the board regardless of their individual stands.

One final comment, the decision to change the 5 members to a mailing list was an excellent one and should be a great help in making things run a lot smoother in the future. The more points of view you have the better the decision you can make, of course its also much harder to make the decision but that's life.
-Cliff
 
I remember a classic line from the show "Taxi", by Jim:

"I don't know what's right,
I don't know what's wrong,
Hell, I don't even know what's going on".

Peace to all!!
 
Spark and Mike,

I apologize for the quite underhanded statements I made earlier, it was a knee-jerk reaction to seeing Les removed. I should not have vented at you guys, at least in the way that I did, which was unfair.

Thanks for being a bit more grown up about it than my actions invited.

Still sorry to see Les removed, hope he still sticks around.


--Doug
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top