- Joined
- Oct 30, 2005
- Messages
- 5,171
The back on many lockbacks will ride up at the interface with the blade when exposed to larger forces in the opening direction.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Depends on what you consider normal use. Lifting and twisting when trying to free a blade stuck in wood, cardboard, etc. can induce lock failure. Striking something with the spine while chopping in a confined space can cause a lock to fail. Stabbing, for example to start a cut in heavy cardboard or chip ice, can cause lock failure.I'm having a hard time trying to understand why a locking mechanism would fail under normal use, be it linerlock or lockback. I'm not being a smart aleck, just really trying to understand. I often carried a slip joint and blade lock has never been an issue. Granted, a locking blade is safer, it's common sense. Everything else being the same, I prefer a locking blade than not. But I never regarded the locking mechanism as being a problem (air quotes). Aesthetically, they can change the look of a knife and that has been my only criterion to pick one over the other.
I guess my point is that I'm looking for more information and enlightenment.![]()
I disagree, the situations I noted above do not involve trying to cut with the spine. All of them can, and have, caused locks to fail. While one can argue that a well made liner lock is safer than a poorly made lockback, all things being equal the lockback will be less prone to failure. I would also disagree with your premise regarding the relative ability of a stop pin and a lock bar to withstand the forces transmitted to them in normal cutting.I'll say it again... As long as you don't cut with the spine, a liner lock isn't going to fail you. Honestly, I can see something in a lockback breaking before the stop pin in a liner lock does (when pushing against the edge.)
Interesting, I choose midlocks because:I buy liner locks and RIL's exclusively and only own 1 backlock/mid lock (Caly 3 ZDP).
For me its a combination of factors;
1) Open construction = Easier to clean, you can just rinse your knife through.
2) Lack of back spacers or all that hardware means liner locks tend to be lighter.
3) Tough enough to withstand anything you would with a folding knife and a lot of things you wouldnt.
4) super easy to close 1 handed, very intuitive.
5) due to the open construction if something is worn or damaged I can see it, visually checking how the liner engages the tang every once in a while will be able to warn you of potential future problems. Hard to do with a lockback.
At the end of the day all locks mechanisms from quality makers are safe and reliable thus the lock shouldnt be the motivating factor when purchasing a knife, rather look at the design and features and rest assured that if Spyderco releases a locking knife it WILL lock regardless of the lock design.
Interesting, I choose midlocks because:
1) Closed construction = less chance for gunk to get in.
2) Solid back means midlocks will be more rigid.
3) Tough enough to withstand anything I'd do with a folding knife and a lot of things I wouldn't.![]()
4) Very easy to close one handed.
5) Far less subject to wearing out than liner locks. Most common "point of failure" is breakage of the lock spring, which occurs when opening or closing the knife, not while it's being used. Excessive vertical play will warn sensible users to retire the knife.
6) Equally easy to open and close with either hand.
7) More opening resistance = less chance of being labeled a gravity knife.
I also stick with midlocks for consistency. I know I do not have the mental flexibility I once had, so carrying knives which all work the same way gives me one less thing to have to think about.
Paul
![]()
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Kiwimania ---- Spydiewiki
Dead horses beaten, sacred cows tipped, chimeras hunted when time permits.
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
It's easy to grin when your ship comes in and good fortune and fame are your lot, but the man worthwhile is the man who can smile with his shorts twsited up in a knot. - Morey Amsterdam
+1 on that. Glad you understood the point of my post. :thumbup:Different strokes for different people. Its a true testament to our passion that we will debate a style of lock endlessly when 99% of "normal" people really couldn't care less!
As long as Sal keeps pumping out lots of new models that suit both our tastes I am happy.![]()
+1 on that. Glad you understood the point of my post. :thumbup:
No "bad" choices here, just that one (lock, clip position, handle material, grind, blade length, edge type, etc.) may be "better" for you and another "better" for me.
Paul
![]()
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Kiwimania ---- Spydiewiki
Dead horses beaten, sacred cows tipped, chimeras hunted when time permits.
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
It's easy to grin when your ship comes in and good fortune and fame are your lot, but the man worthwhile is the man who can smile with his shorts twsited up in a knot. - Morey Amsterdam
....I don't know which one is stronger and I really don't trust any of them, because they CAN fold on you and it has happened to me with a lockback. I never use folders like fixed blades anyway. They're folders.
I'm 64 and the only things more flexible than they use to be are things I wish were not.I could not of put it better myself. I'm 54 years old and the old fingers aren't as flexible as they used to be. (heck, nothing is for that matter!)
Also, if I'm at work trying to close a lock back with one finger in the hole then I'm sticking that blade out there for all the sheeples to see and possibly freak out. For me, the liner lock is faster. I do a 2 step. I close the blade against my thumbnail and then close her up completely after that.
For me, personally, I'll never own a lockback unless it was given to me. Even then I can't see it getting more use than my Sage I. (I love this knife)
Think you've missed the mark there.Spyderco should switch locking system to a titanium based ring lock system with a .25 thick pivot and reinforced rim.
Debate solved.![]()
Think you've missed the mark there.What "everybody" wants is a lock that:
Your suggestion, at best, only satisfies two of those criteria.
- allows the knife to flick open like a gravity knife
- turns it into a virtual fixed blade when open - zero play, zero chance of failure
- impossible to close accidentally, no matter how absurdly unrealistic the hand position
- easy and totall safe to close one handed intentionally, preferably using only a single motion
Paul
![]()
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Kiwimania ---- Spydiewiki
Dead horses beaten, sacred cows tipped, chimeras hunted when time permits.
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
It's easy to grin when your ship comes in and good fortune and fame are your lot, but the man worthwhile is the man who can smile with his shorts twsited up in a knot. - Morey Amsterdam