Same soapbox....? Sort of. My read over the years is that he likes simple tools. The size of the knives have changed and evolved with age. Now, he is using a small fixed blade which I think was a wise choice for some one with arthritis in their hands. As he said, it's the original one hand opener.I scanned the original post, but didn't read it too closely. The OP has been on the same soapbox for as long as I have been on the forum. Different post, same views regurgitated for the umpteenth time.
What might those be?
There is no consensus at all. It's your knife, use it as you want. If you do stoopid, pay the price. If you're vewy smart, you may get away with no injury. But there is no warranty...So what is the general consensus that a folding knife should be used for? Nothing more than cutting twine and cutting tape off of packages?
Quiet I am not that old ! Yes... Of course I am.
I stand corrected. You are right.Same soapbox....? Sort of. My read over the years is that he likes simple tools. The size of the knives have changed and evolved with age. Now, he is using a small fixed blade which I think was a wise choice for some one with arthritis in their hands. As he said, it's the original one hand opener.
You can criticize if you like, but he has been consistent over the years. Most people I suspect don't go back to read old J jackknife tales. He has seen a lot over the years and much more than me. So, I enjoy the reading the threads.
There is nothing wrong with choosing different paths, different knives or types of knives and use. I like the variety of knives that are available today. I like the wide variety of handmade knives in both folding and fixed bladed configurations. Generally I get the fixed blades but not so much the folders as I like the factory offerings.
So, different views are a good thing. Many have not participated in the forum for as many years as Jackknife. My visits here started after I got a faster internet connection as I became frustrated with slow dial up internet speeds.
I fully support this message.Really? The opinion* that carrying a fixed blade is better than carrying a folder, because some very, very old person personally knows a few knuckleheads who hurt themselves using poor technique (heh, sucks for them). Then it was followed up by a bunch more "GET OFF MAH LAWWWWWNNNN" retirement home suspender-wearing corncob pipe smoking rhetoric about how expensive folding knives make zero sense, and locking mechanisms are worthless. A few more pages with some more eye-rolling comments have followed, though it was definitely entertaining to be sure.
Some folks have the lifestyle to be able to carry a belt-knife. Good for them. Plenty of others don't, therefore objectively disproving the claim about fixed blades being "the best". And at the end of the day, if you're using a knife to do what a knife is made to do (which is "cut things" for those who need the reminder), then having a fixed blade or folding knife really makes no difference. I know, I know, this is crazy, but stay with me. Did you know you could cut a sandwich, nip a shirt thread, open an envelope, cut some rope, or whittle some wood just as well with, say, a Spyderco Endura, as you can with a Buck 119 or 102? I KNOW!!! INSANE, right?? So crazy. We're definitely not in Kansas anymore, amirite?
If you are incapable of understanding the limitations of the tool you're carrying, then sure, carry a fixed blade (and maybe wear a helmet). However, if you don't suffer from that particular affliction, then you're good carrying a folding knife.
At the end of the day, folks are free to carry what they want. But making sweeping opinions-stated-as-facts about what they personally prefer, and why it's somehow better than what others prefer is...well, it's dumb, to be perfectly candid.
* Because it sure isn't a fact.
And I guess in this overly long winded post, that brings me to my point. The modern do-it-all lock blade that can deanimate enemy sentries or pry open a Russian tank hatch. Why?