Have to admit, I want my toothy edge to work better on that weird paper you've got
Well...it won't. Can't. The world is a land full of compromises, and the biggest problem with us contemporary, 'civilized' humans is that we feel entitled to that which entails as little compromise as possible. We fucking LOVE convenience, almost above all else, it seems! People are crasser, ruder and more extreme in their viewpoints because of that particular sense of entitlement. It's the rot of our humanity. That sense of entitlement robs us of our empathy, and it's empathy that keeps us in check.
The 'edge' is pure, a pure thing. There are direct results that can be observed by anyone, regardless of experience, that create immediate consequences in the utility on our most ancient tool. Or perhaps 'harness of geometry', as opposed to 'tool', if you will. Most people are aware of either dull, or sharp. The more experience the user of an edge has results in an increasingly nuanced view that inherently must embrace compromise. Hence, there are differently finished edges depending on the desired result of a cut.
Your intention with this particular knife was not to cut paper. Therefore, it is not a spectacular paper cutter.
And it isn't just the edge. Weight, balance, dimensions...ergonomic, physical interface plays a huge role in performance. This knife would immediately cut paper better if the blade to handle ratio were reversed, for example- all things being equal.
This knife is built to cut at speed- it has a heavy, long blade- relatively speaking. That's why it can do something which is very difficult to do, like cut a free hanging butyl inner tube, or a free standing single rolled piece of standard paper in tight spaces, with a minimum of swing-out.
I'm looking forward to getting a little footage cutting the type of stuff it's meant to cut:thumbup: