The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
HiltonP said:I'm still here . . .
and I stand by my first post.
Posted by HiltonP:
. . .clearly Im outgunned here in this testosterone filled room. . .
Any post needs to be considered carefully because, while it is all fine and well to enjoy freedom of speech, that freedom does not come without the responsibility of the ramification of your post. Each person sitting at his or her keyboard has tremendous power to inflame, insult and cast aspersions in an arena where they can be anonymous. A seemingly innocent question asked here turned out to be loaded with implication and the subsequent responses, some of which were very impulsive, were full of implication and accusation. Consider carefully what you write before you write it. How you phrase your questions and comments can make all the difference with what implications it might have. All these posts are written into posterity and all of us are accountable for what we have written. No one has the right to destroy someone elses character or, potentially, his livelihood.
GigOne said:Clearly, Mr. Mayo is well thought of, as a person and maker. Hes a stand-up person and people dont like it when someone makes a claim like you did and insinuate that he's lying.Based on this last sentence. . .it's easy to see how you can be thought of as a troll.
HiltonP said:...I was quite disappointed to see in photos posted in the other Mayo TNT thread that the laser cutting marks are still clearly visible....
- which itself rather harshly insinuates that Mr. Mayo may be lying about his not having used laser-cutting in crafting his works -HiltonP said:I'm still here . . .
and I stand by my first post.
...The reactions have been misguided because its NOT the laser cutting I have a problem with, but rather the finish.
...I may have been expressing an opinion based on a photograph, but some here are making judgements without any base.
DumboRAT said:Mr. Montgomery and Mr. HiltonP -
I apologize for my jumping to conclusions and calling Mr. HiltonP a troll - but still, I believe that his/your last series of posts reflect nothing other than the behavior of trolling.
HiltonP said:The reactions have been misguided because its NOT the laser cutting I have a problem with, but rather the finish. I couldnt care less if a knifemaker has his pieces profiled on the planet Zog by green men using ray guns. Ive never believed that we should lock knifemaking into a pre-computer era, it limits the potential for development and growth. I do however understand that it is an emotive topic in some circles, and a hostile one in others.
I like Mr Mayos folders, I think that little semi-Wharncliffe is a magic piece of design. I was blunt (!) in my post. If the expression of a personal opinion offends, then so be it. It is my view, and I would not wish to see a rough finish on the thumb hole of my folder at that price point.
db said:What a bunch of bs. I clearly understood that H had a problem with the marks in the hole and not how they were put there. His first post is just fine. Personally the marks don't bother me, but H surly has the right to his opinion.
Posted by db:
. . .H surly has the right to his opinion. . .
When one refers to Laser marks, it's a safe assumption to conclude a LASER was used to make them. I would think that on a knife forum, Laser marks mean marks left by use of a laser, mill marks are marks left by a mill, and file marks are marks made by use of a file.db said:Mr. Mayo you surely have a right, and maybe even a duty to correct a comment on how your knives are made. However, to say Hilton was clearly implying you made your knives by CNC from that post is ridiculous. He called milling marks as lazar marks but he was clearly talking about the marks and not how they were made. For all the rest of the bandwagon warriors who think they can tell whoever what they can or cannot say, or how it should be said can its not worth my time. Maybe we should try and understand WHAT someone is saying, instead of how they say it.
wolfmann601 said:When one refers to Laser marks, it's a safe assumption to conclude a LASER was used to make them. I would think that on a knife forum, Laser marks mean marks left by use of a laser, mill marks are marks left by a mill, and file marks are marks made by use of a file.
Hilton stated that the marks were "Laser marks" and then stood by his claim.
there is simply no way any knife made by Tom Mayo had "laser marks". The only laser Tom owns is worn on his hip attached to his Glock![]()