So a while back I made a thread discussing the hypothetical situation of what handguns would be recommended if polymer had never caught on, and materials like steel and aluminum still reigned supreme.
Now I think it's time for another thread with a similar setting. Let's take the same setting and discuss it regarded small, subcompact, pocket pistols. What would be getting carried if this area of technology had never advanced past the early 90s, before subcompact 9mms and polymer materials didn't come along? No Glock 26 or subsequent models, no Ruger LCPs, no Kel-Tec P32, P3AT, no PF9, nothing of the sort. Would the .25 ACP and .32 ACP still be regarded as popular options if there were no .380 ACP options of similar size and weight? Would the products of Raven Arms and Jimenez Arms be seeing more widespread use?
Now I think it's time for another thread with a similar setting. Let's take the same setting and discuss it regarded small, subcompact, pocket pistols. What would be getting carried if this area of technology had never advanced past the early 90s, before subcompact 9mms and polymer materials didn't come along? No Glock 26 or subsequent models, no Ruger LCPs, no Kel-Tec P32, P3AT, no PF9, nothing of the sort. Would the .25 ACP and .32 ACP still be regarded as popular options if there were no .380 ACP options of similar size and weight? Would the products of Raven Arms and Jimenez Arms be seeing more widespread use?