I was hoping that I am missing something in the law, but apparently it is up to a Jury to decide. What a waste of money. I find it repulsive. I believe that this type of "up to certain interpretation" thing is to oppress the poor and/or ignorant. Not only do I not know that the law MIGHT consider my Military illegal, but I have researched it, and can find no evidence of actual illegality. In fact, I just found this... if you are in Colorado, and carry a larger knife, you should print this out and put it in your wallet, or save it for later if you need it... From the horse's mouth, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation Website:
http://cbi.state.co.us/ccw/Statutes/18-12-101.asp
Definition of "knife" in subsection (1)(f) of this section is not void for vagueness or overbreadth. Where defendant possessed a screwdriver with specific intent to use it as a weapon, elements of crime defined in § 18-12-108 were present. People v. Gross, 830 P.2d 933 (Colo. 1992).
Defendant's intent to use an object as a weapon is not established by the object's appearance alone, even if the appearance demonstrates that its primary use is as a weapon; this test does not follow Gross and is contrary to the plain language of the concealed weapons statute. A.P.E. v. People, 20 P.3d 1179 (Colo. 2001).
The definition of "knife" in subsection (1)(f) of this section is sufficiently specific to give fair warning of the proscribed conduct and is therefore constitutional. In applying the definition under section 18-12-108, the prosecution must prove that one of the intended uses of the instrument by the defendant was as a weapon. People v. Gross, 830 P.2d 933 (Colo. 1992).