Who is overrating Emerson? Everytime a thread like this pops up it seems like Emerson gets bashed pretty hard. I think people have a pretty difficult time understanding what the terms overrated and underrated actually mean. Just because you think Emersons are overpriced doesn't necessarily mean that the resounding opinion of the company is negative. The majority of people who are into the knife world enough to know what an Emerson is, probably thinks they are overpriced for what they are-especially those people that frequent BFC, which is another point entirely. Those of you mentioning Hogue as underrated, here are some figures: a particular knife supplier sells a Hogue EX01 for ~160$, they sell a Mini Commander for roughly ~140$. Both knives are similar in size and both knives use similar materials-with the exception of the ti liner on the locking side of the Emerson. Many people may not appreciate the Emerson finish-the lack of polished liners, etc.-but the fit on the knives regarding blade tolerances are excellent. I have never handled an Emerson with loose lockup that couldn't be remedied by ~15 seconds of pivot adjustment. Many of these same people arguing over the materials of the Emerson are also die hard Chris Reeve fanboys. If we take into account the materials used by CRK, the same argument used against Emerson-in terms of materials-holds true in regard to CRK.
I am not angered or enraged at all, before you try to troll me. I am simply pointing out that very few people in this thread understand what the terms underrated and overrated actually mean.
p.s. Ask this question at another knife-centric forum and you will see an entirely different set of answers.