My stepbrother has a Manix 2 XL.
Uses it hard in a metal fabrication shop.
I didn't like it when I held it so I did not get one.
He uses the hell out of it though, and it holds up extremely well.
Keep in mind this is a guy who has worn out other knives, and considers them tools to be replaced when worn out; he is by no means a "Knife Knut."
You will
never see any pictures of knives taken by him, nor is he a member here.
In real life use by someone who cares only about performance, it is still going strong.
Yes, I've read that many times. Always the same story. I know (insert family member, friend, neighbor ninja) who uses it really hard in (insert tough sounding place) in real life.
Well, sorry, but I use my knives mostly in my innocent non-threatening flowers growing backyard and in gentle make·shift workshop full of kittens.
And I certainly can't help if my knife usage is classified as simulation by the real life experts.
According to fanboys It's hard use only if used in metal fabrication, dropped in furnace in steel foundry, used in war zone, cutting plutonium rods in nuclear reactor or chopping rocks on the moon.
But you know what? Knives don't care. And I don't care about your definition of what constitutes hard use.
All I know is that for my usage, Manix 2 XL is not up to the task, original Manix was.
Original Manix = Solidly built, tough, heavy duty, beefy, hard use folder. Deserving all the prize it got.
Manix 2 XL = undeservedly lives off of the reputation of the original Manix. Flimsy, overrated, equipped with mall ninja features, lightened to be used by folks who couldn't lift 1 ounce heavier original Manix.
Most people who used both would agree with that, including large number of Spyderco fanboys, but they'll admit that only on official Spyderco forums. Never here.