Na, it's stacking the odds too much. I like scout knives and SAK's and do consider them traditional, but for the sake of discussion I'd leave the scout/SAK out of it. JUst too much utility for a knife that's just a knife to compete against. It'd be like coming to a local sports car club event with the local working guys with their hopped up Mazda Miata's or mini coopers, with a all out full blown Porshe followed by a semi rig carrying your pit crew with spare engines and machine shop.
I'm willing to put the knife-knifes against other knife-knives for discussion and eave the SAK out of it. Even a 4 blade congress can't compete with a SAK tinker for utility.
We're not far off but are getting there by different paths.
As a (now hobbyist) mechanic, I always prefer real tools to multi-tools. And, I strongly prefer multi-tools to knives with tool blades, like campers and SAKs.
Note, I say this as an emotional fan of the US-style camper. I grew up with Ulsters and still carry one every once in a while for old time's sake. I keep some laying around the shop as a basic utility knife for the blade and the very occasional use of the awl. But day in/day out, I don't carry one. Here's why...
I've moved all of my tools needs off of my knife. I would much, much, much rather carry a mini-multitool like a Micra in addition to a knife than try to stuff that functionality clumsily into a knife. As much as I love my old Ulsters, the Micra blows its doors off. When the jobs become bigger, I'll throw a larger multitool on my belt, or grab a proper tool box. Knives are knives and tools are tools.
So I arrive at the same place you, being interested the most functional KNIFE and comparing knives to knives. But, I don't want to exclude somebody from making their case for an SAK. IMO, SAKs and Campers are knives with tools stuck on them and for that reason, become lousy tools and less useful knives. But that's just me.
I'll share my pick for a knife later.