- Joined
- Aug 11, 1999
- Messages
- 1,111
The Ang Khola is routinely praised for its chopping, and recently the Sirupati has gained good attention (e.g., Will Kwans muscular Sirupati rvw). Yet I dont recall any performance assessments of the British Army Svc and WWII models. How do these compare?
For the sake of setting up a scale (plz amend if you disagree): The blade-heavy Ang Khola is great for chopping, and Will Kwan noted that the neutral-balanced Sirupati is very effective for machete-style use. These two activities -- chopping stable, fixed objects vs unstable or loosely hanging objects of widely varying density and texture -- demand virtually opposing qualities in terms of blade thickness and balance. Any balance between these two criteria would require a compromise on both ends, but may offer a more all-round, versatile khukuri, yes?
How do the BAS and WWII measure on this scale? More generally: of all the HI khukuris, which model/length do believe is the most versatile, and why?
Glen
For the sake of setting up a scale (plz amend if you disagree): The blade-heavy Ang Khola is great for chopping, and Will Kwan noted that the neutral-balanced Sirupati is very effective for machete-style use. These two activities -- chopping stable, fixed objects vs unstable or loosely hanging objects of widely varying density and texture -- demand virtually opposing qualities in terms of blade thickness and balance. Any balance between these two criteria would require a compromise on both ends, but may offer a more all-round, versatile khukuri, yes?
How do the BAS and WWII measure on this scale? More generally: of all the HI khukuris, which model/length do believe is the most versatile, and why?
Glen