Many weeks ago I exploded at Dan Koster and basically threw the kitchen sink at him. That has bothered me much since. I violated one of my prime rules- to take it to the source, and to give the other guy a chance.
I misused the forum and myself, and I gave an unneccesary insult to Dan Koster. For Dan, I am sorry. You deserved better. Once being labled harshly, no one deserves being treated evily.
I want the forum to know that if Dan had responded, as would have been his right, any disciplinary action against him would have resulted in my quiting the forum in protest. Fortunately, I do not believe for a second Rusty would have done any such thing. !! On that, I am sure.
I have been sick of munk for some time. Too many altruistic and fine ideals have been attributed to him. The real munk makes mistakes, and pays his dues. This will not be the first or last time munk is a 'bad' guy, and won't until the Fat Lady sings.
Many of you have been angry with munk since this incident. Fine! Go for it! If self rightiousness looked bad on munk it can't possibly look any better on anyone else.
It is good to live in a land where munk is not universally respected. Thank goodness!
For my friends, for sticking to me, even when I'd behaved badly, you are the best. I'll never forget it. For Uncle Bill and Rusty, in giving me and all of us this home and sanctuary where we can progress a little more after each fall; Thank you and God Bless you.
I am going to divulge a confidence here, because it needs to be said. Dan once wrote to me upon being made moderator that he just, "wants everyone to be happy." I believed him then, told Uncle Bill the same, and am telling you now that despite my harsh words to him that is the Dan I address in this forum; the one who teaches, answers questions, is Mr Enthusiam, and wants, 'everybody to be happy."
munk
I misused the forum and myself, and I gave an unneccesary insult to Dan Koster. For Dan, I am sorry. You deserved better. Once being labled harshly, no one deserves being treated evily.
I want the forum to know that if Dan had responded, as would have been his right, any disciplinary action against him would have resulted in my quiting the forum in protest. Fortunately, I do not believe for a second Rusty would have done any such thing. !! On that, I am sure.
I have been sick of munk for some time. Too many altruistic and fine ideals have been attributed to him. The real munk makes mistakes, and pays his dues. This will not be the first or last time munk is a 'bad' guy, and won't until the Fat Lady sings.
Many of you have been angry with munk since this incident. Fine! Go for it! If self rightiousness looked bad on munk it can't possibly look any better on anyone else.
It is good to live in a land where munk is not universally respected. Thank goodness!
For my friends, for sticking to me, even when I'd behaved badly, you are the best. I'll never forget it. For Uncle Bill and Rusty, in giving me and all of us this home and sanctuary where we can progress a little more after each fall; Thank you and God Bless you.
I am going to divulge a confidence here, because it needs to be said. Dan once wrote to me upon being made moderator that he just, "wants everyone to be happy." I believed him then, told Uncle Bill the same, and am telling you now that despite my harsh words to him that is the Dan I address in this forum; the one who teaches, answers questions, is Mr Enthusiam, and wants, 'everybody to be happy."
munk