I'm not usually a big fan of so-called "tactical" knives, but Sibert's custom version looked interesting and unique, though I've never held one, and from the on-line photos, Benchmade appeared to have done a decent enough job on their mass-produced version, so I asked to handle one at a local shop.
The workmanship on this sample was more or less commensurate with the retail price, the blade was almost centered (but fairly dull), and it's certainly a handsome enough pattern at first glance, particularly on the clip side. I applaud them for their decision to go with green G-10, rather than the usual tired, generic black, but what a boat-anchor!
I was amazed that something so overweight and overwrought made it past the design stage. This boxy brick punishes the scales (and the pocket) at
over 1/3 of a pound with a 2.9" blade! If the blade and handle thickness were reduced by half, the proportions would probably be just about right. I was looking for a compact and reasonably robust cutting tool, not a folding forklift.
What's up with this obese pocketknife marketing trend? I thought it was fairly common knowledge that thin blades perform better than thick ones, at least when it comes to things like, you know...
cutting stuff, all else being equal. Why would a designer severely compromise a smallish folder's performance and ergonomics with all that completely superfluous weight and bulk? Needless to say, I passed on this one with some regret. It really looked nice, right up until I had it in my hand. To each their own, but I want a folder that doesn't require Nomex/Kevlar reinforced suspenders to hold my pants up when it's in my pocket.
Regarding the 755 Maxi Pocket Rock's so-called tactical nature; I suppose you could drop it on the bad guy's foot. The ensuing six months of painful traction he'll have to endure in order to walk again should cause him think to twice before limping off to perpetrate another assault in the future.