Alright guys, about a month ago, I got my BM 707 and decided i would no longer need to look for anymore knives. I was wrong.
My addiction has returned and now I want a Sage
The problem is, I cannot for the life of me decide which one I like better. I narrowed it down to the sage 1 and 2, because neither of the others does much for me. The pros and cons of both just balance out so perfectly, I am absolutely stumped
I have read and watched as many reviews and comparisons as i possibly can, but i still cant decide. Theres no way to get them in hand first because my only local store doesnt carry either at the moment. I KNOW I want the sage 2, and if their prices were the same, the race wouldnt be nearly as close. But since the sage two has an extra 40 bucks on the price tag, the sage 1 is looking like the better option. Unfortunately, the sage 1 is just NOT the knife I want if given the choice. I love it as well, but the 2 just speaks to me a little more. I love its simplicity (just a slab of s30 between two slabs of Ti) and the fact that it has a frame lock over the 1's liner lock. BUT the sage 2 also has been reported to have problems with the lock bar wearing because it is so soft compared to the blade tang (which wouldnt be much of a problem on the sage 1). Also, theres always the possibility of the lock overtravelling if im not careful. This combo is tough for me to overlook
The sage 1 is nice, but im actually not very fond of the bumpy weave they have on the carbon fiber (and its not full CF anyway, just G10 topped with CF). I would rather it be smooth like the caly 3 and native 4 were. But overall, I think the sage 1 is very good looking and im sure i would love it when i got it in hand (especially because I can get it much cheaper than the sage 2 and therefore could have it sooner) I dont even mind the linerlock, but it DOES look a bit thin (and afterall, linerlocks can wear too)
But the main point I am struggling with is the fact that my collection is based entirely on diversity. I want a knife that is completely different than my others. Sage 1 is meh because I already have a linerlocking knife. The sage 2 fits that bill perfectly because it has a frame lock and Ti handles (both of which I have never owned knives with). I like the sages because they are a perfect middle ground between my para2 and native 5, and have a different blade shape. But which one should I get???? Please offer more than "get both"

The problem is, I cannot for the life of me decide which one I like better. I narrowed it down to the sage 1 and 2, because neither of the others does much for me. The pros and cons of both just balance out so perfectly, I am absolutely stumped

The sage 1 is nice, but im actually not very fond of the bumpy weave they have on the carbon fiber (and its not full CF anyway, just G10 topped with CF). I would rather it be smooth like the caly 3 and native 4 were. But overall, I think the sage 1 is very good looking and im sure i would love it when i got it in hand (especially because I can get it much cheaper than the sage 2 and therefore could have it sooner) I dont even mind the linerlock, but it DOES look a bit thin (and afterall, linerlocks can wear too)
But the main point I am struggling with is the fact that my collection is based entirely on diversity. I want a knife that is completely different than my others. Sage 1 is meh because I already have a linerlocking knife. The sage 2 fits that bill perfectly because it has a frame lock and Ti handles (both of which I have never owned knives with). I like the sages because they are a perfect middle ground between my para2 and native 5, and have a different blade shape. But which one should I get???? Please offer more than "get both"
